1.10 - Revision history

Neil thibodaux: /* Jamie's Story */

2026-08-19T23:59:39Z

Jamie's Story

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:59, 19 August 2026
Line 10:		Line 10:

	* '''[[Index of Attributes]]'''		* '''[[Index of Attributes]]'''
	* '''Previous Attribute -''' '''1.09'''		* '''Previous Attribute -''' '''[[1.09]]'''
	* '''Next Attribute -''' '''2.01'''__FORCETOC__		* '''Next Attribute -''' '''[[2.01]]'''__FORCETOC__

	=== Jamie's Story ===		=== Jamie's Story ===

Neil thibodaux: /* Election Anomalies */

2026-08-19T23:58:58Z

Election Anomalies

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:58, 19 August 2026
Line 17:		Line 17:

	=== Election Anomalies ===		=== Election Anomalies ===
	~~No examples are available~~ to ~~illustrate governance gaps for this attribute~~.
			==== [[Dropbox Collection (2020)]] ====
			The following statement is made in the AZ AG's Office 2020 General Election inverstigation.

			"After October 21, 2020, the number of ballots received became too large to utilize the ballot counter and the decision was made to weigh the trays containing approximately 200 ballots each." This appears to be a significant change from the established process. The decision changed the method of counting ballots from counting each ballot to estimating the number of ballots based on the weight of the box.

			Potential Governance Gap:

			Contrary to the Green Book, it's unclear whether it was a frontline or management, but a "decision was made" to deviate from using the ballot counter as part of what appears to be an established process. This appears to be an ethical concern in that willful deviations from the process can be implemented on the fly. The deviation from the established process was significant, changing from an actual count to an estimate by weight.

Neil thibodaux at 23:54, 19 August 2026

2026-08-19T23:54:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:54, 19 August 2026
Line 12:		Line 12:
	* '''Previous Attribute -''' '''1.09'''		* '''Previous Attribute -''' '''1.09'''
	* '''Next Attribute -''' '''2.01'''__FORCETOC__		* '''Next Attribute -''' '''2.01'''__FORCETOC__
	Jamie's Story
			=== Jamie's Story ===
	No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.		No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.
	Election Anomalies
			=== Election Anomalies ===
	No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.		No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.

Neil thibodaux at 23:52, 19 August 2026

2026-08-19T23:52:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:52, 19 August 2026
Line 11:		Line 11:
	* '''[[Index of Attributes]]'''		* '''[[Index of Attributes]]'''
	* '''Previous Attribute -''' '''1.09'''		* '''Previous Attribute -''' '''1.09'''
	* '''Next Attribute -''' '''2.01'''		* '''Next Attribute -''' '''2.01'''__FORCETOC__
			Jamie's Story
			No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.
			Election Anomalies
			No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.

Neil thibodaux at 16:18, 15 August 2026

2026-08-15T16:18:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:18, 15 August 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	'''Principle 1: Demonstrate Commitment to Integrity and Ethical Values'''		'''Principle 1: Demonstrate Commitment to Integrity and Ethical Values'''

	'''~~Adherence~~ to ~~Standards~~ of ~~Conduct~~'''		'''Attribute 1.10:''' Management determines tolerance levels for deviations from standards of conduct. For instance, management may determine that the entity will have zero tolerance for deviations from certain expected standards of conduct, while deviations from others may be addressed with warnings to personnel. Management establishes a process for evaluations of individual and team adherence to standards of conduct that escalates and remediates deviations timely and consistently. Management, with oversight from the entity's oversight body and with consideration of applicable laws and regulations, takes appropriate actions to remediate deviations.

			<nowiki>***</nowiki>

			'''Navigational Buttons:'''

	'''Attribute 1.~~10:~~''' ~~Management determines tolerance levels for deviations from standards of conduct~~. For instance, management may determine that the entity will have zero tolerance for deviations from certain expected standards of conduct, while deviations from others may be addressed with warnings to personnel. Management establishes a process for evaluations of individual and team adherence to standards of conduct that escalates and remediates deviations timely and consistently. Management, with oversight from the entity'~~s oversight body and with consideration of applicable laws and regulations, takes appropriate actions to remediate deviations.~~		* '''[[Index of Attributes]]'''
			* '''Previous Attribute -''' '''1.09'''
			* '''Next Attribute -''' '''2.01'''

Neil thibodaux: Created page with "'''Control Environment''' '''Principle 1: Demonstrate Commitment to Integrity and Ethical Values''' '''Adherence to Standards of Conduct''' '''Attribute 1.10:''' Management determines tolerance levels for deviations from standards of conduct. For instance, management may determine that the entity will have zero tolerance for deviations from certain expected standards of conduct, while deviations from others may be addressed with warnings to personnel. Management estab..."

2026-08-14T10:49:16Z

Created page with "'''Control Environment''' '''Principle 1: Demonstrate Commitment to Integrity and Ethical Values''' '''Adherence to Standards of Conduct''' '''Attribute 1.10:''' Management determines tolerance levels for deviations from standards of conduct. For instance, management may determine that the entity will have zero tolerance for deviations from certain expected standards of conduct, while deviations from others may be addressed with warnings to personnel. Management estab..."

New page

'''Control Environment'''

'''Principle 1: Demonstrate Commitment to Integrity and Ethical Values'''

'''Adherence to Standards of Conduct'''

'''Attribute 1.10:''' Management determines tolerance levels for deviations from standards of conduct. For instance, management may determine that the entity will have zero tolerance for deviations from certain expected standards of conduct, while deviations from others may be addressed with warnings to personnel. Management establishes a process for evaluations of individual and team adherence to standards of conduct that escalates and remediates deviations timely and consistently. Management, with oversight from the entity's oversight body and with consideration of applicable laws and regulations, takes appropriate actions to remediate deviations.