10.12 - Revision history

Neil thibodaux: /* Election Anomalies */

2026-08-26T15:47:18Z

Election Anomalies

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:47, 26 August 2026
Line 16:		Line 16:

	=== Election Anomalies ===		=== Election Anomalies ===

			===== [[Dropbox Collection (2020)\|Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020)]] =====
			Governance issues identified from [https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation] of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County Election Department - Drop Box Collections issues.

			From this Green Book Attribute, government entities are advised that controls to prevent fraud are generally more cost-effective than controls that detect fraud. Ensuring early ballots are mailed only to valid voters is a control that prevents fraud. In 2020, over 56,000 early ballots were sent to fictious addresses and returned to the USPS as undeliverable; see the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Fictious Addresses in the MC Voter Registration Database\|Deviation: Fictious Addresses in MC Voter Registration Database]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage for more information. Fraudsters have other methods to acquire valid ballots from ineligible or fictitious voters. Accurate voter registration databases are a cost-effective control to preventive fraud.

	===== [[Signature Verification\|Maricopa County Signature Verification (2020)]] =====		===== [[Signature Verification\|Maricopa County Signature Verification (2020)]] =====
	Governance issues identified from [https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation] of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County - Signature Verification Process issues. There are three paths to ensuring a valid early ballot is tabulated, which are 1) Signature Verifier may allow the ballot to pass through directly to tabulation, 2) an early ballot flagged by the Signature Verifier may be cured or authenticated by a separate team, and 3) a citizen may confirm their vote has been tabulated. Meanwhile, the Signature Verifier is the single person that has the responsibility of detecting a potentially fraudulent ballot. There are fewer methods to detect fraud than there are to authenticate a valid early ballot.		Governance issues identified from [https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation] of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County - Signature Verification Process issues. There are three paths to ensuring a valid early ballot is tabulated, which are 1) Signature Verifier may allow the ballot to pass through directly to tabulation, 2) an early ballot flagged by the Signature Verifier may be cured or authenticated by a separate team, and 3) a citizen may confirm their vote has been tabulated. Meanwhile, the Signature Verifier is the single person that has the responsibility of detecting a potentially fraudulent ballot. There are fewer methods to detect fraud than there are to authenticate a valid early ballot.

Neil thibodaux: /* Election Anomalies */

2026-08-22T22:49:32Z

Election Anomalies

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:49, 22 August 2026
Line 16:		Line 16:

	=== Election Anomalies ===		=== Election Anomalies ===
	~~No examples~~ are ~~available~~ to ~~illustrate governance gaps for this attribute~~.
			===== [[Signature Verification\|Maricopa County Signature Verification (2020)]] =====
			Governance issues identified from [https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation] of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County - Signature Verification Process issues. There are three paths to ensuring a valid early ballot is tabulated, which are 1) Signature Verifier may allow the ballot to pass through directly to tabulation, 2) an early ballot flagged by the Signature Verifier may be cured or authenticated by a separate team, and 3) a citizen may confirm their vote has been tabulated. Meanwhile, the Signature Verifier is the single person that has the responsibility of detecting a potentially fraudulent ballot. There are fewer methods to detect fraud than there are to authenticate a valid early ballot.

Neil thibodaux at 16:30, 22 August 2026

2026-08-22T16:30:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:30, 22 August 2026
Line 7:		Line 7:
	'''>>>Navigational Buttons<<<'''		'''>>>Navigational Buttons<<<'''
	* '''[[Index of Attributes]]'''		* '''[[Index of Attributes]]'''
	* '''Previous Attribute - ?'''		* '''Previous Attribute - [[10.11]]'''
	* '''Next Attribute - ?'''		* '''Next Attribute - [[10.13]]'''
	__FORCETOC__		__FORCETOC__

	=== '''No ~~Examples'''~~ ===
			=== Jamie's Story ===
			No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.

			=== Election Anomalies ===
			No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.

Neil thibodaux at 01:25, 16 August 2026

2026-08-16T01:25:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:25, 15 August 2026
Line 4:		Line 4:

	'''Attribute 10.12''' - Management designs an appropriate mix of preventive and detective control activities to mitigate risks to an acceptable level, prioritizing preventive control activities where appropriate. When designing control activities, management first considers preventive control activities, as they generally offer the most cost-efficient use of resources and are generally effective at mitigating fraud and improper payment risks. Management next considers detective control activities and may design both preventive and detective control activities when necessary to mitigate a particular risk.		'''Attribute 10.12''' - Management designs an appropriate mix of preventive and detective control activities to mitigate risks to an acceptable level, prioritizing preventive control activities where appropriate. When designing control activities, management first considers preventive control activities, as they generally offer the most cost-efficient use of resources and are generally effective at mitigating fraud and improper payment risks. Management next considers detective control activities and may design both preventive and detective control activities when necessary to mitigate a particular risk.

			'''>>>Navigational Buttons<<<'''
			* '''[[Index of Attributes]]'''
			* '''Previous Attribute - ?'''
			* '''Next Attribute - ?'''
			__FORCETOC__

			=== '''No Examples''' ===

Neil thibodaux: Created page with "'''Control Activities''' '''Principle 10 - Design Control Activities''' '''Attribute 10.12''' - Management designs an appropriate mix of preventive and detective control activities to mitigate risks to an acceptable level, prioritizing preventive control activities where appropriate. When designing control activities, management first considers preventive control activities, as they generally offer the most cost-efficient use of resources and are generally effective at..."

2026-08-16T01:04:19Z

Created page with "'''Control Activities''' '''Principle 10 - Design Control Activities''' '''Attribute 10.12''' - Management designs an appropriate mix of preventive and detective control activities to mitigate risks to an acceptable level, prioritizing preventive control activities where appropriate. When designing control activities, management first considers preventive control activities, as they generally offer the most cost-efficient use of resources and are generally effective at..."

New page

'''Control Activities'''

'''Principle 10 - Design Control Activities'''

'''Attribute 10.12''' - Management designs an appropriate mix of preventive and detective control activities to mitigate risks to an acceptable level, prioritizing preventive control activities where appropriate. When designing control activities, management first considers preventive control activities, as they generally offer the most cost-efficient use of resources and are generally effective at mitigating fraud and improper payment risks. Management next considers detective control activities and may design both preventive and detective control activities when necessary to mitigate a particular risk.