15.01 - Revision history

Neil thibodaux: /* March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Chose to be Represented in Court */

2026-09-14T17:49:22Z

March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Chose to be Represented in Court

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:49, 14 September 2026
Line 28:		Line 28:
	I directed questions to the Maricopa County Recorder, expecting a response since this is an elected position. I incorrectly assumed that elected officials would be interested in addressing citizen concerns. There was a brief interface between me and the Maricopa County Recorder. However, there was no response to my inquiries.		I directed questions to the Maricopa County Recorder, expecting a response since this is an elected position. I incorrectly assumed that elected officials would be interested in addressing citizen concerns. There was a brief interface between me and the Maricopa County Recorder. However, there was no response to my inquiries.

	==== March 12, 2026: ~~This is How~~ Maricopa County ~~Chose to be Represented in Court~~ ====		==== [[March 12, 2026: Maricopa County Defense Briefing]] ====
	This discussion of Attribute 15.01 from this March 12, 2026 event is specifically from a discussion titled, "No Duty to Explain Anything."		This discussion of Attribute 15.01 from this March 12, 2026 event is specifically from a discussion titled, "No Duty to Explain Anything."

Line 34:		Line 34:

	=== Election Anomalies ===		=== Election Anomalies ===
	~~'''<big>>>>>This needs to be written after all seven issues have been addressed.<<<<</big>'''~~

	===== [[Dropbox Collection (2020)\|Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020)]] =====		===== [[Dropbox Collection (2020)\|Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020)]] =====
	This explanation also applies to the following topics based on the content of the [https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation] report:		This explanation also applies to the following topics based on the content of the [https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation] report:

Neil thibodaux: /* 2020 -General Election */

2026-09-04T18:06:06Z

2020 -General Election

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:06, 4 September 2026
Line 22:		Line 22:
	=== Jamie's Story ===		=== Jamie's Story ===

	==== 2020 -General Election ====		==== [[2020: General Election Anomalies]] ====
	Maricopa County's performance with the tabulation of ballots during the 2020 General Election deviated significantly from past elections. Any rationalization to attribute the results to Covid-19 public health mandates could be discredited given that Maricopa County's performance was substandard to the tabulation of results nationwide, which were also operating under Covid-19 public health mandates. The external communications did not adequately address the public's concerns.		Maricopa County's performance with the tabulation of ballots during the 2020 General Election deviated significantly from past elections. Any rationalization to attribute the results to Covid-19 public health mandates could be discredited given that Maricopa County's performance was substandard to the tabulation of results nationwide, which were also operating under Covid-19 public health mandates. The external communications did not adequately address the public's concerns.

			==== [[2021: My Journey Begins]] ====
			I directed questions to the Maricopa County Recorder, expecting a response since this is an elected position. I incorrectly assumed that elected officials would be interested in addressing citizen concerns. There was a brief interface between me and the Maricopa County Recorder. However, there was no response to my inquiries.

	==== March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Chose to be Represented in Court ====		==== March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Chose to be Represented in Court ====

Neil thibodaux: /* Jamie's Story */

2026-09-03T23:51:22Z

Jamie's Story

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:51, 3 September 2026
Line 21:		Line 21:

	=== Jamie's Story ===		=== Jamie's Story ===

			==== 2020 -General Election ====
			Maricopa County's performance with the tabulation of ballots during the 2020 General Election deviated significantly from past elections. Any rationalization to attribute the results to Covid-19 public health mandates could be discredited given that Maricopa County's performance was substandard to the tabulation of results nationwide, which were also operating under Covid-19 public health mandates. The external communications did not adequately address the public's concerns.

	==== March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Chose to be Represented in Court ====		==== March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Chose to be Represented in Court ====

Neil thibodaux: /* Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) */

2026-08-26T19:38:37Z

Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:38, 26 August 2026
Line 28:		Line 28:

	=== Election Anomalies ===		=== Election Anomalies ===
			'''<big>>>>>This needs to be written after all seven issues have been addressed.<<<<</big>'''

	===== [[Dropbox Collection (2020)\|Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020)]] =====		===== [[Dropbox Collection (2020)\|Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020)]] =====
	This explanation also applies to the following topics based on the content of the [https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation] report:		This explanation also applies to the following topics based on the content of the [https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation] report:

			* Maricopa County Signature Verification Process
			* Maricopa County Drop Box Collections
			* Maricopa County Election Management Server
			* Maricopa County Data not provided fTor election audit
			* Pima County Voter Spike
			* Unknown Published Flyer
			* Representative Mark Finchem 35,000 votes embedded into Pima County

			Management should communicate relevant and quality information with appropriate external parties regarding matters impacting the functioning of the internal control system.
	which investigated Arizona Senate allegations of improper conduct by Maricopa County Election Department - Drop Box Collections issues.		which investigated Arizona Senate allegations of improper conduct by Maricopa County Election Department - Drop Box Collections issues.

Neil thibodaux: /* Election Anomalies */

2026-08-26T19:30:35Z

Election Anomalies

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:30, 26 August 2026
Line 28:		Line 28:

	=== Election Anomalies ===		=== Election Anomalies ===

			===== [[Dropbox Collection (2020)\|Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020)]] =====
			This explanation also applies to the following topics based on the content of the [https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation] report:


			which investigated Arizona Senate allegations of improper conduct by Maricopa County Election Department - Drop Box Collections issues.

			===== [[Signature Verification\|Maricopa County Signature Verification (2020)]] =====
			Governance issues identified from [https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation] of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County - Signature Verification Process issues.

			See [[Dropbox Collection (2020)\|Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020)]] , above for an explanation of this attribute, 15.01 to this election anomaly.

Neil thibodaux at 23:11, 22 August 2026

2026-08-22T23:11:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:11, 22 August 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	'''Principle 15 - Communicate Externally'''		'''Principle 15 - Communicate Externally'''

	'''Attribute 15.01''' - Management should communicate relevant and quality information with appropriate external parties regarding matters impacting the functioning of the internal control system.~~<sup>108</sup>~~		'''Attribute 15.01''' - Management should communicate relevant and quality information with appropriate external parties regarding matters impacting the functioning of the internal control system.

	<u>Attribute Categories</u>		<u>Attribute Categories</u>

Neil thibodaux at 17:39, 22 August 2026

2026-08-22T17:39:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:39, 22 August 2026
Line 15:		Line 15:
	'''>>>Navigational Buttons<<<'''		'''>>>Navigational Buttons<<<'''
	* '''[[Index of Attributes]]'''		* '''[[Index of Attributes]]'''
	* '''Previous Attribute - 14.08'''		* '''Previous Attribute - [[14.08]]'''
	* '''Next Attribute - 15.02'''		* '''Next Attribute - [[15.02]]'''
	__FORCETOC__		__FORCETOC__

Neil thibodaux at 17:38, 22 August 2026

2026-08-22T17:38:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:38, 22 August 2026
Line 15:		Line 15:
	'''>>>Navigational Buttons<<<'''		'''>>>Navigational Buttons<<<'''
	* '''[[Index of Attributes]]'''		* '''[[Index of Attributes]]'''
	* '''Previous Attribute - ?'''		* '''Previous Attribute - 14.08'''
	* '''Next Attribute - ?'''		* '''Next Attribute - 15.02'''
	__FORCETOC__		__FORCETOC__

	=== March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Chose to be Represented in Court ===
			=== Jamie's Story ===

			==== March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Chose to be Represented in Court ====
	This discussion of Attribute 15.01 from this March 12, 2026 event is specifically from a discussion titled, "No Duty to Explain Anything."		This discussion of Attribute 15.01 from this March 12, 2026 event is specifically from a discussion titled, "No Duty to Explain Anything."

	In response to my request to provide an explanation for records withheld, the complete quote of the legal team was "Defendants have no duty to provide an index or explain anything." The management and legal teams were compelled to belittle a citizen who dared to inquire into their business practices. The legal team provided a legal argument, which refuted my claim that they were responsible to fulfill my request. I referred to a statute, which seemed applicable. However, they referred to definition within another statute to explain why my claim didn't apply. Much later, the later, they got to the point, no index would be provided because no documents were withheld.		In response to my request to provide an explanation for records withheld, the complete quote of the legal team was "Defendants have no duty to provide an index or explain anything." The management and legal teams were compelled to belittle a citizen who dared to inquire into their business practices. The legal team provided a legal argument, which refuted my claim that they were responsible to fulfill my request. I referred to a statute, which seemed applicable. However, they referred to definition within another statute to explain why my claim didn't apply. Much later, the later, they got to the point, no index would be provided because no documents were withheld. Contrary to the Green Book, the Maricopa County acted in a manner which suggested they felt no duty to explain their actions or inactions to members of the public.

	~~<u>Potential~~ Green Book ~~Deviation:</u>~~

	~~Contrary to the Green Book, the Maricopa County acted in a manner which suggested they felt no duty to explain their actions or inactions to members of the public.~~		=== Election Anomalies ===

Neil thibodaux: /* March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Chose to be Represented in Court */

2026-08-16T11:48:59Z

March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Chose to be Represented in Court

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:48, 16 August 2026
Line 23:		Line 23:

	In response to my request to provide an explanation for records withheld, the complete quote of the legal team was "Defendants have no duty to provide an index or explain anything." The management and legal teams were compelled to belittle a citizen who dared to inquire into their business practices. The legal team provided a legal argument, which refuted my claim that they were responsible to fulfill my request. I referred to a statute, which seemed applicable. However, they referred to definition within another statute to explain why my claim didn't apply. Much later, the later, they got to the point, no index would be provided because no documents were withheld.		In response to my request to provide an explanation for records withheld, the complete quote of the legal team was "Defendants have no duty to provide an index or explain anything." The management and legal teams were compelled to belittle a citizen who dared to inquire into their business practices. The legal team provided a legal argument, which refuted my claim that they were responsible to fulfill my request. I referred to a statute, which seemed applicable. However, they referred to definition within another statute to explain why my claim didn't apply. Much later, the later, they got to the point, no index would be provided because no documents were withheld.

	<u>Potential Green Book Deviation:</u>		<u>Potential Green Book Deviation:</u>

	Contrary to the Green Book, the Maricopa County acted in a manner which suggested they felt no duty to explain their actions or inactions to members of the public.		Contrary to the Green Book, the Maricopa County acted in a manner which suggested they felt no duty to explain their actions or inactions to members of the public.

Neil thibodaux: /* March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Chose to be Represented in Court */

2026-08-16T11:48:42Z

March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Chose to be Represented in Court

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:48, 16 August 2026
Line 23:		Line 23:

	In response to my request to provide an explanation for records withheld, the complete quote of the legal team was "Defendants have no duty to provide an index or explain anything." The management and legal teams were compelled to belittle a citizen who dared to inquire into their business practices. The legal team provided a legal argument, which refuted my claim that they were responsible to fulfill my request. I referred to a statute, which seemed applicable. However, they referred to definition within another statute to explain why my claim didn't apply. Much later, the later, they got to the point, no index would be provided because no documents were withheld.		In response to my request to provide an explanation for records withheld, the complete quote of the legal team was "Defendants have no duty to provide an index or explain anything." The management and legal teams were compelled to belittle a citizen who dared to inquire into their business practices. The legal team provided a legal argument, which refuted my claim that they were responsible to fulfill my request. I referred to a statute, which seemed applicable. However, they referred to definition within another statute to explain why my claim didn't apply. Much later, the later, they got to the point, no index would be provided because no documents were withheld.


	<u>Potential Green Book Deviation:</u>		<u>Potential Green Book Deviation:</u>

	Contrary to the Green Book, the Maricopa County acted in a manner which suggested they felt no duty to explain their actions or inactions to members of the public.		Contrary to the Green Book, the Maricopa County acted in a manner which suggested they felt no duty to explain their actions or inactions to members of the public.