15.01 - Revision history

Neil thibodaux: /* March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Chose to be Represented in Court */

2026-08-16T11:48:59Z

March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Chose to be Represented in Court

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:48, 16 August 2026
Line 23:		Line 23:

	In response to my request to provide an explanation for records withheld, the complete quote of the legal team was "Defendants have no duty to provide an index or explain anything." The management and legal teams were compelled to belittle a citizen who dared to inquire into their business practices. The legal team provided a legal argument, which refuted my claim that they were responsible to fulfill my request. I referred to a statute, which seemed applicable. However, they referred to definition within another statute to explain why my claim didn't apply. Much later, the later, they got to the point, no index would be provided because no documents were withheld.		In response to my request to provide an explanation for records withheld, the complete quote of the legal team was "Defendants have no duty to provide an index or explain anything." The management and legal teams were compelled to belittle a citizen who dared to inquire into their business practices. The legal team provided a legal argument, which refuted my claim that they were responsible to fulfill my request. I referred to a statute, which seemed applicable. However, they referred to definition within another statute to explain why my claim didn't apply. Much later, the later, they got to the point, no index would be provided because no documents were withheld.

	<u>Potential Green Book Deviation:</u>		<u>Potential Green Book Deviation:</u>

	Contrary to the Green Book, the Maricopa County acted in a manner which suggested they felt no duty to explain their actions or inactions to members of the public.		Contrary to the Green Book, the Maricopa County acted in a manner which suggested they felt no duty to explain their actions or inactions to members of the public.

Neil thibodaux: /* March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Chose to be Represented in Court */

2026-08-16T11:48:42Z

March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Chose to be Represented in Court

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:48, 16 August 2026
Line 23:		Line 23:

	In response to my request to provide an explanation for records withheld, the complete quote of the legal team was "Defendants have no duty to provide an index or explain anything." The management and legal teams were compelled to belittle a citizen who dared to inquire into their business practices. The legal team provided a legal argument, which refuted my claim that they were responsible to fulfill my request. I referred to a statute, which seemed applicable. However, they referred to definition within another statute to explain why my claim didn't apply. Much later, the later, they got to the point, no index would be provided because no documents were withheld.		In response to my request to provide an explanation for records withheld, the complete quote of the legal team was "Defendants have no duty to provide an index or explain anything." The management and legal teams were compelled to belittle a citizen who dared to inquire into their business practices. The legal team provided a legal argument, which refuted my claim that they were responsible to fulfill my request. I referred to a statute, which seemed applicable. However, they referred to definition within another statute to explain why my claim didn't apply. Much later, the later, they got to the point, no index would be provided because no documents were withheld.


	<u>Potential Green Book Deviation:</u>		<u>Potential Green Book Deviation:</u>

	Contrary to the Green Book, the Maricopa County acted in a manner which suggested they felt no duty to explain their actions or inactions to members of the public.		Contrary to the Green Book, the Maricopa County acted in a manner which suggested they felt no duty to explain their actions or inactions to members of the public.

Neil thibodaux at 11:48, 16 August 2026

2026-08-16T11:48:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:48, 16 August 2026
Line 12:		Line 12:
	* Appropriate Methods of Communication		* Appropriate Methods of Communication

	~~=== March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Chose to be Represented in Court ===~~
	~~This discussion of Attribute 15.01 from this March 12, 2026 event is specifically from a discussion titled, "No Duty to Explain Anything."~~

	In response to my request to provide an explanation for records withheld, the complete quote of the legal team was "Defendants have no duty to provide an index or explain anything." The management and legal teams were compelled to belittle a citizen who dared to inquire into their business practices. The legal team provided a legal argument, which refuted my claim that they were responsible to fulfill my request. I referred to a statute, which seemed applicable. However, they referred to definition within another statute to explain why my claim didn't apply. Much later, the later, they got to the point, no index would be provided because no documents were withheld.

	'''>>>Navigational Buttons<<<'''		'''>>>Navigational Buttons<<<'''
Line 23:		Line 19:
	__FORCETOC__		__FORCETOC__

	=== ~~'''No Examples'''~~ ===		=== March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Chose to be Represented in Court ===
			This discussion of Attribute 15.01 from this March 12, 2026 event is specifically from a discussion titled, "No Duty to Explain Anything."

			In response to my request to provide an explanation for records withheld, the complete quote of the legal team was "Defendants have no duty to provide an index or explain anything." The management and legal teams were compelled to belittle a citizen who dared to inquire into their business practices. The legal team provided a legal argument, which refuted my claim that they were responsible to fulfill my request. I referred to a statute, which seemed applicable. However, they referred to definition within another statute to explain why my claim didn't apply. Much later, the later, they got to the point, no index would be provided because no documents were withheld.

Neil thibodaux at 11:47, 16 August 2026

2026-08-16T11:47:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:47, 16 August 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	'''Principle 15 - Communicate Externally'''		'''Principle 15 - Communicate Externally'''

	'''Attribute 15.01''' - Management should communicate relevant and quality information with appropriate external parties regarding matters impacting the functioning of the internal control system.		'''Attribute 15.01''' - Management should communicate relevant and quality information with appropriate external parties regarding matters impacting the functioning of the internal control system.<sup>108</sup>

			<u>Attribute Categories</u>

			The following attributes contribute to the design, implementation, and operating effectiveness of this principle:

			* Communication with External Parties
			* Appropriate Methods of Communication

	=== March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Chose to be Represented in Court ===		=== March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Chose to be Represented in Court ===
Line 9:		Line 16:

	In response to my request to provide an explanation for records withheld, the complete quote of the legal team was "Defendants have no duty to provide an index or explain anything." The management and legal teams were compelled to belittle a citizen who dared to inquire into their business practices. The legal team provided a legal argument, which refuted my claim that they were responsible to fulfill my request. I referred to a statute, which seemed applicable. However, they referred to definition within another statute to explain why my claim didn't apply. Much later, the later, they got to the point, no index would be provided because no documents were withheld.		In response to my request to provide an explanation for records withheld, the complete quote of the legal team was "Defendants have no duty to provide an index or explain anything." The management and legal teams were compelled to belittle a citizen who dared to inquire into their business practices. The legal team provided a legal argument, which refuted my claim that they were responsible to fulfill my request. I referred to a statute, which seemed applicable. However, they referred to definition within another statute to explain why my claim didn't apply. Much later, the later, they got to the point, no index would be provided because no documents were withheld.

			'''>>>Navigational Buttons<<<'''
			* '''[[Index of Attributes]]'''
			* '''Previous Attribute - ?'''
			* '''Next Attribute - ?'''
			__FORCETOC__

			=== '''No Examples''' ===


	<u>Potential Green Book Deviation:</u>		<u>Potential Green Book Deviation:</u>

	Contrary to the Green Book, the Maricopa County acted in a manner which suggested they felt no duty to explain their actions or inactions to members of the public.		Contrary to the Green Book, the Maricopa County acted in a manner which suggested they felt no duty to explain their actions or inactions to members of the public.

Neil thibodaux at 11:45, 16 August 2026

2026-08-16T11:45:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:45, 16 August 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
			'''Information and Communication'''

	'''Principle 15 - Communicate Externally'''		'''Principle 15 - Communicate Externally'''

Neil thibodaux at 22:31, 13 August 2026

2026-08-13T22:31:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:31, 13 August 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:

	'''Attribute 15.01''' - Management should communicate relevant and quality information with appropriate external parties regarding matters impacting the functioning of the internal control system.		'''Attribute 15.01''' - Management should communicate relevant and quality information with appropriate external parties regarding matters impacting the functioning of the internal control system.

			=== March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Chose to be Represented in Court ===
			This discussion of Attribute 15.01 from this March 12, 2026 event is specifically from a discussion titled, "No Duty to Explain Anything."

			In response to my request to provide an explanation for records withheld, the complete quote of the legal team was "Defendants have no duty to provide an index or explain anything." The management and legal teams were compelled to belittle a citizen who dared to inquire into their business practices. The legal team provided a legal argument, which refuted my claim that they were responsible to fulfill my request. I referred to a statute, which seemed applicable. However, they referred to definition within another statute to explain why my claim didn't apply. Much later, the later, they got to the point, no index would be provided because no documents were withheld.

			<u>Potential Green Book Deviation:</u>

			Contrary to the Green Book, the Maricopa County acted in a manner which suggested they felt no duty to explain their actions or inactions to members of the public.

Neil thibodaux at 22:03, 13 August 2026

2026-08-13T22:03:22Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:03, 13 August 2026
Line 1:	Line 1:
		'''Principle 15 - Communicate Externally'''

		'''Attribute 15.01''' - Management should communicate relevant and quality information with appropriate external parties regarding matters impacting the functioning of the internal control system.

Neil thibodaux: Created blank page

2026-08-13T22:01:06Z

Created blank page

New page