16.06 - Revision history

Neil thibodaux: /* June 8, 2026: Maricopa County's Ombudsman */

2026-09-15T18:15:46Z

June 8, 2026: Maricopa County's Ombudsman

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:15, 15 September 2026
Line 14:		Line 14:
	=== Jamie's Story ===		=== Jamie's Story ===

	==== [[June 8, 2026: ~~Maricopa County's~~ Ombudsman]] ====		==== [[June 8, 2026: Arizona State Ombudsman Replies]] ====
	Ombudsman investigations could be utilized as a separate evaluation per this Attribute, 16.06 However, Maricopa County's Ombudsman program is deficient to Arizona Ombudsman Citizens' Aide (AZOCA) agency. Maricopa County has job positions with Ombudsman in the title. However, Maricopa County Ombudsmen do not have the organizational independence to effectively perform their expected duties of an Ombudsman as defined by internationally recognized organizations for Ombudsmen programs.		Ombudsman investigations could be utilized as a separate evaluation per this Attribute, 16.06 However, Maricopa County's Ombudsman program is deficient to Arizona Ombudsman Citizens' Aide (AZOCA) agency. Maricopa County has job positions with Ombudsman in the title. However, Maricopa County Ombudsmen do not have the organizational independence to effectively perform their expected duties of an Ombudsman as defined by internationally recognized organizations for Ombudsmen programs.

	=== Election Anomalies ===		=== Election Anomalies ===
	No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.		No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.

Neil thibodaux: /* Jamie's Story */

2026-09-15T16:24:37Z

Jamie's Story

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:24, 15 September 2026
Line 13:		Line 13:

	=== Jamie's Story ===		=== Jamie's Story ===
	~~No examples are available~~ to ~~illustrate governance gaps~~ for ~~this attribute~~.
			==== [[June 8, 2026: Maricopa County's Ombudsman]] ====
			Ombudsman investigations could be utilized as a separate evaluation per this Attribute, 16.06 However, Maricopa County's Ombudsman program is deficient to Arizona Ombudsman Citizens' Aide (AZOCA) agency. Maricopa County has job positions with Ombudsman in the title. However, Maricopa County Ombudsmen do not have the organizational independence to effectively perform their expected duties of an Ombudsman as defined by internationally recognized organizations for Ombudsmen programs.

	=== Election Anomalies ===		=== Election Anomalies ===
	No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.		No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.

Neil thibodaux at 18:07, 22 August 2026

2026-08-22T18:07:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:07, 22 August 2026
Line 7:		Line 7:
	'''>>>Navigational Buttons<<<'''		'''>>>Navigational Buttons<<<'''
	* '''[[Index of Attributes]]'''		* '''[[Index of Attributes]]'''
	* '''Previous Attribute - ?'''		* '''Previous Attribute - [[16.05]]'''
	* '''Next Attribute - ?'''		* '''Next Attribute - [[16.07]]'''
	__FORCETOC__		__FORCETOC__

	=== '''No ~~Examples'''~~ ===
			=== Jamie's Story ===
			No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.

			=== Election Anomalies ===
			No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.

Neil thibodaux at 12:26, 16 August 2026

2026-08-16T12:26:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:26, 16 August 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	'''Principle 16 - Perform Monitoring Activities'''		'''Principle 16 - Perform Monitoring Activities'''

	'''Attribute 16.06''' - Management uses separate evaluations to monitor the design and operating effectiveness of the overall internal control system at a specific time or of a specific function or process. The scope and frequency of separate evaluations depend primarily on the assessment of risks, risk responses, evolving technology, identification of new risks or deficiencies, results of ongoing monitoring, and rate of change within the entity and its environment. Management may also increase the frequency of separate evaluations when management rapidly implements a new program or substantially changes an existing one, such as emergency assistance programs. Separate evaluations include observations, inquiries, reviews, improper payment estimates,~~<sup>112</sup>~~ and other examinations, as appropriate. These evaluate whether controls to effect principles across the entity are designed, implemented, and operating effectively. Separate evaluations may also take the form of self-assessments, which include cross-operating unit or cross-functional evaluations.		'''Attribute 16.06''' - Management uses separate evaluations to monitor the design and operating effectiveness of the overall internal control system at a specific time or of a specific function or process. The scope and frequency of separate evaluations depend primarily on the assessment of risks, risk responses, evolving technology, identification of new risks or deficiencies, results of ongoing monitoring, and rate of change within the entity and its environment. Management may also increase the frequency of separate evaluations when management rapidly implements a new program or substantially changes an existing one, such as emergency assistance programs. Separate evaluations include observations, inquiries, reviews, improper payment estimates, and other examinations, as appropriate. These evaluate whether controls to effect principles across the entity are designed, implemented, and operating effectively. Separate evaluations may also take the form of self-assessments, which include cross-operating unit or cross-functional evaluations.

	'''>>>Navigational Buttons<<<'''		'''>>>Navigational Buttons<<<'''

Neil thibodaux at 12:26, 16 August 2026

2026-08-16T12:26:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:26, 16 August 2026
Line 4:		Line 4:

	'''Attribute 16.06''' - Management uses separate evaluations to monitor the design and operating effectiveness of the overall internal control system at a specific time or of a specific function or process. The scope and frequency of separate evaluations depend primarily on the assessment of risks, risk responses, evolving technology, identification of new risks or deficiencies, results of ongoing monitoring, and rate of change within the entity and its environment. Management may also increase the frequency of separate evaluations when management rapidly implements a new program or substantially changes an existing one, such as emergency assistance programs. Separate evaluations include observations, inquiries, reviews, improper payment estimates,<sup>112</sup> and other examinations, as appropriate. These evaluate whether controls to effect principles across the entity are designed, implemented, and operating effectively. Separate evaluations may also take the form of self-assessments, which include cross-operating unit or cross-functional evaluations.		'''Attribute 16.06''' - Management uses separate evaluations to monitor the design and operating effectiveness of the overall internal control system at a specific time or of a specific function or process. The scope and frequency of separate evaluations depend primarily on the assessment of risks, risk responses, evolving technology, identification of new risks or deficiencies, results of ongoing monitoring, and rate of change within the entity and its environment. Management may also increase the frequency of separate evaluations when management rapidly implements a new program or substantially changes an existing one, such as emergency assistance programs. Separate evaluations include observations, inquiries, reviews, improper payment estimates,<sup>112</sup> and other examinations, as appropriate. These evaluate whether controls to effect principles across the entity are designed, implemented, and operating effectively. Separate evaluations may also take the form of self-assessments, which include cross-operating unit or cross-functional evaluations.

			'''>>>Navigational Buttons<<<'''
			* '''[[Index of Attributes]]'''
			* '''Previous Attribute - ?'''
			* '''Next Attribute - ?'''
			__FORCETOC__

			=== '''No Examples''' ===

Neil thibodaux: Created page with "'''Monitoring''' '''Principle 16 - Perform Monitoring Activities''' '''Attribute 16.06''' - Management uses separate evaluations to monitor the design and operating effectiveness of the overall internal control system at a specific time or of a specific function or process. The scope and frequency of separate evaluations depend primarily on the assessment of risks, risk responses, evolving technology, identification of new risks or deficiencies, results of ongoing moni..."

2026-08-16T12:18:31Z

Created page with "'''Monitoring''' '''Principle 16 - Perform Monitoring Activities''' '''Attribute 16.06''' - Management uses separate evaluations to monitor the design and operating effectiveness of the overall internal control system at a specific time or of a specific function or process. The scope and frequency of separate evaluations depend primarily on the assessment of risks, risk responses, evolving technology, identification of new risks or deficiencies, results of ongoing moni..."

New page

'''Monitoring'''

'''Principle 16 - Perform Monitoring Activities'''

'''Attribute 16.06''' - Management uses separate evaluations to monitor the design and operating effectiveness of the overall internal control system at a specific time or of a specific function or process. The scope and frequency of separate evaluations depend primarily on the assessment of risks, risk responses, evolving technology, identification of new risks or deficiencies, results of ongoing monitoring, and rate of change within the entity and its environment. Management may also increase the frequency of separate evaluations when management rapidly implements a new program or substantially changes an existing one, such as emergency assistance programs. Separate evaluations include observations, inquiries, reviews, improper payment estimates,<sup>112</sup> and other examinations, as appropriate. These evaluate whether controls to effect principles across the entity are designed, implemented, and operating effectively. Separate evaluations may also take the form of self-assessments, which include cross-operating unit or cross-functional evaluations.