8.09 - Revision history

Neil thibodaux: /* Jamie's Story */

2026-09-15T05:30:29Z

Jamie's Story

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:30, 14 September 2026
Line 18:		Line 18:

	My Public Records Request sought the contract between MC and the MVD. No contract was delivered because no written agreement was prepared. Per the MC management and legal team, MC is only required to document where specified in statutory requirements. This attribute, 8.09, was noteworthy for this governance assessment because the possibility of Management Override had never been considered before viewing this attribute. Given the Covid-19 public health controls that were implemented in from 2020 through 2022, management overrides may have been necessary for some of the election sub-processes. Manual overrides are a lower tier process feature, which would not be addressed in A.R.S.. Therefore, MC county would be expected to be unable to identify which management overrides were implemented and who approved them. Contrary to the Green Book, it wis doubtful that MC management considered the risk of their own management overrides as risking the integrity of voter registration data transferred from the MVD to MC. More concerning is the possibility that MC managers may have been performing manual overrides during the Covid-19 Pandemic, using the health crises as enabling situation to conceal fraudulent activities.		My Public Records Request sought the contract between MC and the MVD. No contract was delivered because no written agreement was prepared. Per the MC management and legal team, MC is only required to document where specified in statutory requirements. This attribute, 8.09, was noteworthy for this governance assessment because the possibility of Management Override had never been considered before viewing this attribute. Given the Covid-19 public health controls that were implemented in from 2020 through 2022, management overrides may have been necessary for some of the election sub-processes. Manual overrides are a lower tier process feature, which would not be addressed in A.R.S.. Therefore, MC county would be expected to be unable to identify which management overrides were implemented and who approved them. Contrary to the Green Book, it wis doubtful that MC management considered the risk of their own management overrides as risking the integrity of voter registration data transferred from the MVD to MC. More concerning is the possibility that MC managers may have been performing manual overrides during the Covid-19 Pandemic, using the health crises as enabling situation to conceal fraudulent activities.

			==== [[June 1, 2026: Judge's Decision]] ====
			The Runbeck Contract that was provided to Jamie had numerous strikeouts and amendments that were poorly documented, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic. Maricopa County would not voluntarily explain these changes and they were not required to maintain documentation because they were not specified as a statutory requirement.

	=== Election Anomalies ===		=== Election Anomalies ===

Neil thibodaux: /* March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Wants to be Represented in Court */

2026-09-14T17:40:43Z

March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Wants to be Represented in Court

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:40, 14 September 2026
Line 13:		Line 13:

	=== Jamie's Story ===		=== Jamie's Story ===
	==== [[March 12, 2026: ~~This is How~~ Maricopa County ~~Wants to be Represented in Court~~]] ====
			==== [[March 12, 2026: Maricopa County Defense Briefing]] ====
	Additional details regarding this aspect of my story are available in a subsection titled Contract with the Motor Vehicle Department (MVD).N		Additional details regarding this aspect of my story are available in a subsection titled Contract with the Motor Vehicle Department (MVD).N

Neil thibodaux: /* Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) */

2026-08-25T19:48:35Z

Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:48, 25 August 2026
Line 28:		Line 28:
	* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Allegations Confirmed\|Deviation: Allegations Confirmed]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.		* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Allegations Confirmed\|Deviation: Allegations Confirmed]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.

	~~The~~ prior Green Book Attribute [[8.08]] c		Potential abuse of MC leadership authority was assessed in the prior Green Book Attribute [[8.08]]. This attribute suggests these leadership abuses may have been implemented under the guise of a legitimate management override. However, there is insufficient documentation available to determine under what authority were changes implemented to allow these procedure violations. No justification for the change was documented, which may have been helpful to assess the legitimacy of management overrides, if that is how they were rolled out to the Election Department staff.

	* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Missing Entries on Election Forms\|Deviation: Missing Entries on Election Forms]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
	* See the ~~heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Missing Ballot Counts\|Deviation: Missing Ballot Counts]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.~~
	* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Used Email instead of ~~EVBTS Forms\|Deviation: Used Email instead of EVBTS Forms]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage~~.
	* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Unfulfilled Party Representation Requirement for Couriers.~~\|Deviation: Unfulfilled Party Representation Requirements~~ for ~~Couriers]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.~~
	* See the ~~heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Fictious Addresses in~~ the ~~MC Voter Registration Database\|Deviation: Fictious Addresses in MC Voter Registration Database]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.~~
	*
	* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Noteworthy: Consequences Unknown\|Noteworthy: Consequences Unknown]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage
	* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Noteworthy: Transmission of ~~USPS Data~~ to ~~MC and Runbeck\|Noteworthy: Transmission of USPS Data to MC and Runbeck]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage~~

	===== [[Signature Verification\|Maricopa County Signature Verification (2020)]] =====		===== [[Signature Verification\|Maricopa County Signature Verification (2020)]] =====

Neil thibodaux: /* Election Anomalies */

2026-08-25T19:35:49Z

Election Anomalies

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:35, 25 August 2026
Line 22:		Line 22:

	The Green Book's <u>emphasis on fraud and information security</u> as separate risk assessment activity is intentional. MC may be able to defer to the Arizona Secretary of State's Election Procedure Manual as general steps taken to ensure the integrity of election results. Fraud occurs when loopholes are identified and exploited by the fraudsters. The implementers of election services (i.e., Arizona Counties) are better positioned to detect fraud and assess the risk of fraud because they are handling the data, not the state. Hence, governance gaps may be identified from patterns of poor assessment and response to risk with respect to election fraud and information security.		The Green Book's <u>emphasis on fraud and information security</u> as separate risk assessment activity is intentional. MC may be able to defer to the Arizona Secretary of State's Election Procedure Manual as general steps taken to ensure the integrity of election results. Fraud occurs when loopholes are identified and exploited by the fraudsters. The implementers of election services (i.e., Arizona Counties) are better positioned to detect fraud and assess the risk of fraud because they are handling the data, not the state. Hence, governance gaps may be identified from patterns of poor assessment and response to risk with respect to election fraud and information security.

			===== [[Dropbox Collection (2020)\|Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020)]] =====
			Governance issues identified from Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County Election Department - Drop Box Collections issues. Section 2 of the AZ AG's inspector's report identifies numerous issues, which present risk to potential fraud. The Arizona Senate's allegations of inappropriate drop box actions and behaviors were confirmed by the AZ AG's inspector.

			* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Allegations Confirmed\|Deviation: Allegations Confirmed]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.

			The prior Green Book Attribute [[8.08]] c

			* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Missing Entries on Election Forms\|Deviation: Missing Entries on Election Forms]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
			* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Missing Ballot Counts\|Deviation: Missing Ballot Counts]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
			* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Used Email instead of EVBTS Forms\|Deviation: Used Email instead of EVBTS Forms]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
			* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Unfulfilled Party Representation Requirement for Couriers.\|Deviation: Unfulfilled Party Representation Requirements for Couriers]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
			* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Fictious Addresses in the MC Voter Registration Database\|Deviation: Fictious Addresses in MC Voter Registration Database]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
			*
			* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Noteworthy: Consequences Unknown\|Noteworthy: Consequences Unknown]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage
			* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Noteworthy: Transmission of USPS Data to MC and Runbeck\|Noteworthy: Transmission of USPS Data to MC and Runbeck]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage

	===== [[Signature Verification\|Maricopa County Signature Verification (2020)]] =====		===== [[Signature Verification\|Maricopa County Signature Verification (2020)]] =====

Neil thibodaux: /* March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Wants to be Represented in Court */

2026-08-25T19:30:12Z

March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Wants to be Represented in Court

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:30, 25 August 2026
Line 13:		Line 13:

	=== Jamie's Story ===		=== Jamie's Story ===
	==== ~~'''~~[[March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Wants to be Represented in Court]]~~'''~~ ====		==== [[March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Wants to be Represented in Court]] ====
	Additional details regarding this aspect of my story are available in a subsection titled Contract with the Motor Vehicle Department (MVD).N		Additional details regarding this aspect of my story are available in a subsection titled Contract with the Motor Vehicle Department (MVD).N

Neil thibodaux: /* Election Anomalies */

2026-08-25T16:09:42Z

Election Anomalies

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:09, 25 August 2026
Line 19:		Line 19:

	=== Election Anomalies ===		=== Election Anomalies ===
			The Green Book's Principle 8 addresses Assess Fraud, Improper Payment, and Information Security Risk. Obviously, improper payments is not a concern during the Assessment of Election Anomalies. However, improper payments by MC county may exist, but would require a separate assessment.

			The Green Book's <u>emphasis on fraud and information security</u> as separate risk assessment activity is intentional. MC may be able to defer to the Arizona Secretary of State's Election Procedure Manual as general steps taken to ensure the integrity of election results. Fraud occurs when loopholes are identified and exploited by the fraudsters. The implementers of election services (i.e., Arizona Counties) are better positioned to detect fraud and assess the risk of fraud because they are handling the data, not the state. Hence, governance gaps may be identified from patterns of poor assessment and response to risk with respect to election fraud and information security.

	===== [[Signature Verification\|Maricopa County Signature Verification (2020)]] =====		===== [[Signature Verification\|Maricopa County Signature Verification (2020)]] =====

Neil thibodaux: /* The Anomalies */

2026-08-22T20:34:28Z

The Anomalies

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:34, 22 August 2026
Line 13:		Line 13:

	=== Jamie's Story ===		=== Jamie's Story ===
	~~No examples are available.~~

	==== '''[[March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Wants to be Represented in Court]]''' ====		==== '''[[March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Wants to be Represented in Court]]''' ====
	Additional details regarding this aspect of my story are available in a subsection titled Contract with the Motor Vehicle Department (MVD).N		Additional details regarding this aspect of my story are available in a subsection titled Contract with the Motor Vehicle Department (MVD).N
Line 20:		Line 18:
	My Public Records Request sought the contract between MC and the MVD. No contract was delivered because no written agreement was prepared. Per the MC management and legal team, MC is only required to document where specified in statutory requirements. This attribute, 8.09, was noteworthy for this governance assessment because the possibility of Management Override had never been considered before viewing this attribute. Given the Covid-19 public health controls that were implemented in from 2020 through 2022, management overrides may have been necessary for some of the election sub-processes. Manual overrides are a lower tier process feature, which would not be addressed in A.R.S.. Therefore, MC county would be expected to be unable to identify which management overrides were implemented and who approved them. Contrary to the Green Book, it wis doubtful that MC management considered the risk of their own management overrides as risking the integrity of voter registration data transferred from the MVD to MC. More concerning is the possibility that MC managers may have been performing manual overrides during the Covid-19 Pandemic, using the health crises as enabling situation to conceal fraudulent activities.		My Public Records Request sought the contract between MC and the MVD. No contract was delivered because no written agreement was prepared. Per the MC management and legal team, MC is only required to document where specified in statutory requirements. This attribute, 8.09, was noteworthy for this governance assessment because the possibility of Management Override had never been considered before viewing this attribute. Given the Covid-19 public health controls that were implemented in from 2020 through 2022, management overrides may have been necessary for some of the election sub-processes. Manual overrides are a lower tier process feature, which would not be addressed in A.R.S.. Therefore, MC county would be expected to be unable to identify which management overrides were implemented and who approved them. Contrary to the Green Book, it wis doubtful that MC management considered the risk of their own management overrides as risking the integrity of voter registration data transferred from the MVD to MC. More concerning is the possibility that MC managers may have been performing manual overrides during the Covid-19 Pandemic, using the health crises as enabling situation to conceal fraudulent activities.

	=== ~~The~~ Anomalies ===		=== Election Anomalies ===

			===== [[Signature Verification\|Maricopa County Signature Verification (2020)]] =====
			Governance issues identified from [https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation] of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County - Signature Verification Process issues. There was simple and direct justification for manual overrides during the signature verification process step, which were the unusual circumstances associate with public health mandates initiated to address the Covid-19 pandemic.

			The inspector's note did not identify any specific management overrides. However, the inspector describes how training was provided to 33 MC employees in June 2020, noting that this training "mirrored" the recommendations of the Arizona Secretary of State's Election Procedure Manual. Later, the inspector noted that 40 temporary employees were hired during October and began performing Level I Signature Verifications without any training. Was this a Management Override?

Neil thibodaux at 04:50, 22 August 2026

2026-08-22T04:50:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:50, 21 August 2026
Line 11:		Line 11:
	__FORCETOC__		__FORCETOC__

	== ~~Examples from~~ Jamie's Story ==
			=== Jamie's Story ===
	No examples are available.		No examples are available.

	=~~= Examples from the Anomalies ==~~		==== '''[[March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Wants to be Represented in Court]]''' ====

	=== '''[[March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Wants to be Represented in Court]]''' ===
	Additional details regarding this aspect of my story are available in a subsection titled Contract with the Motor Vehicle Department (MVD).N		Additional details regarding this aspect of my story are available in a subsection titled Contract with the Motor Vehicle Department (MVD).N

	My Public Records Request sought the contract between MC and the MVD. No contract was delivered because no written agreement was prepared. Per the MC management and legal team, MC is only required to document where specified in statutory requirements. This attribute, 8.09, was noteworthy for this governance assessment because the possibility of Management Override had never been considered before viewing this attribute. Given the Covid-19 public health controls that were implemented in from 2020 through 2022, management overrides may have been necessary for some of the election sub-processes. Manual overrides are a lower tier process feature, which would not be addressed in A.R.S.. Therefore, MC county would be expected to be unable to identify which management overrides were implemented and who approved them.		My Public Records Request sought the contract between MC and the MVD. No contract was delivered because no written agreement was prepared. Per the MC management and legal team, MC is only required to document where specified in statutory requirements. This attribute, 8.09, was noteworthy for this governance assessment because the possibility of Management Override had never been considered before viewing this attribute. Given the Covid-19 public health controls that were implemented in from 2020 through 2022, management overrides may have been necessary for some of the election sub-processes. Manual overrides are a lower tier process feature, which would not be addressed in A.R.S.. Therefore, MC county would be expected to be unable to identify which management overrides were implemented and who approved them. Contrary to the Green Book, it wis doubtful that MC management considered the risk of their own management overrides as risking the integrity of voter registration data transferred from the MVD to MC. More concerning is the possibility that MC managers may have been performing manual overrides during the Covid-19 Pandemic, using the health crises as enabling situation to conceal fraudulent activities.

	~~<u>Potential~~ Green Book ~~Deviation:</u>~~

	Contrary to the Green Book, it wis doubtful that MC management considered the risk of their own management overrides as risking the integrity of voter registration data transferred from the MVD to MC. More concerning is the possibility that MC managers may have been performing manual overrides during the Covid-19 Pandemic, using the health crises as enabling situation to conceal fraudulent activities.		=== The Anomalies ===

Neil thibodaux at 14:57, 18 August 2026

2026-08-18T14:57:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:57, 18 August 2026
Line 7:		Line 7:
	'''>>>Navigational Buttons<<<'''		'''>>>Navigational Buttons<<<'''
	* '''[[Index of Attributes]]'''		* '''[[Index of Attributes]]'''
	* '''Previous Attribute - 8.08'''		* '''Previous Attribute - [[8.08]]'''
	* '''Next Attribute - 8.10'''		* '''Next Attribute - [[8.10]]'''
	__FORCETOC__		__FORCETOC__

			== Examples from Jamie's Story ==
			No examples are available.

			== Examples from the Anomalies ==

	=== '''[[March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Wants to be Represented in Court]]''' ===		=== '''[[March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Wants to be Represented in Court]]''' ===

Neil thibodaux: /* No Examples */

2026-08-17T18:02:18Z

No Examples

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:02, 17 August 2026
Line 7:		Line 7:
	'''>>>Navigational Buttons<<<'''		'''>>>Navigational Buttons<<<'''
	* '''[[Index of Attributes]]'''		* '''[[Index of Attributes]]'''
	* '''Previous Attribute - ?'''		* '''Previous Attribute - 8.08'''
	* '''Next Attribute - ?'''		* '''Next Attribute - 8.10'''
	__FORCETOC__		__FORCETOC__

	=== '''~~No Examples~~''' ===
			=== '''[[March 12, 2026: This is How Maricopa County Wants to be Represented in Court]]''' ===
			Additional details regarding this aspect of my story are available in a subsection titled Contract with the Motor Vehicle Department (MVD).N

			My Public Records Request sought the contract between MC and the MVD. No contract was delivered because no written agreement was prepared. Per the MC management and legal team, MC is only required to document where specified in statutory requirements. This attribute, 8.09, was noteworthy for this governance assessment because the possibility of Management Override had never been considered before viewing this attribute. Given the Covid-19 public health controls that were implemented in from 2020 through 2022, management overrides may have been necessary for some of the election sub-processes. Manual overrides are a lower tier process feature, which would not be addressed in A.R.S.. Therefore, MC county would be expected to be unable to identify which management overrides were implemented and who approved them.

			<u>Potential Green Book Deviation:</u>

			Contrary to the Green Book, it wis doubtful that MC management considered the risk of their own management overrides as risking the integrity of voter registration data transferred from the MVD to MC. More concerning is the possibility that MC managers may have been performing manual overrides during the Covid-19 Pandemic, using the health crises as enabling situation to conceal fraudulent activities.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:48, 25 August 2026
Line 28:		Line 28:
	* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Allegations Confirmed\|Deviation: Allegations Confirmed]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.		* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Allegations Confirmed\|Deviation: Allegations Confirmed]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.

	~~The~~ prior Green Book Attribute [[8.08]] c		Potential abuse of MC leadership authority was assessed in the prior Green Book Attribute [[8.08]]. This attribute suggests these leadership abuses may have been implemented under the guise of a legitimate management override. However, there is insufficient documentation available to determine under what authority were changes implemented to allow these procedure violations. No justification for the change was documented, which may have been helpful to assess the legitimacy of management overrides, if that is how they were rolled out to the Election Department staff.

	* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Missing Entries on Election Forms\|Deviation: Missing Entries on Election Forms]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
	* See the ~~heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Missing Ballot Counts\|Deviation: Missing Ballot Counts]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.~~
	* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Used Email instead of ~~EVBTS Forms\|Deviation: Used Email instead of EVBTS Forms]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage~~.
	* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Unfulfilled Party Representation Requirement for Couriers.~~\|Deviation: Unfulfilled Party Representation Requirements~~ for ~~Couriers]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.~~
	* See the ~~heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Fictious Addresses in~~ the ~~MC Voter Registration Database\|Deviation: Fictious Addresses in MC Voter Registration Database]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.~~
	*
	* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Noteworthy: Consequences Unknown\|Noteworthy: Consequences Unknown]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage
	* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Noteworthy: Transmission of ~~USPS Data~~ to ~~MC and Runbeck\|Noteworthy: Transmission of USPS Data to MC and Runbeck]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage~~

	===== [[Signature Verification\|Maricopa County Signature Verification (2020)]] =====		===== [[Signature Verification\|Maricopa County Signature Verification (2020)]] =====

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:35, 25 August 2026
Line 22:		Line 22:

	The Green Book's <u>emphasis on fraud and information security</u> as separate risk assessment activity is intentional. MC may be able to defer to the Arizona Secretary of State's Election Procedure Manual as general steps taken to ensure the integrity of election results. Fraud occurs when loopholes are identified and exploited by the fraudsters. The implementers of election services (i.e., Arizona Counties) are better positioned to detect fraud and assess the risk of fraud because they are handling the data, not the state. Hence, governance gaps may be identified from patterns of poor assessment and response to risk with respect to election fraud and information security.		The Green Book's <u>emphasis on fraud and information security</u> as separate risk assessment activity is intentional. MC may be able to defer to the Arizona Secretary of State's Election Procedure Manual as general steps taken to ensure the integrity of election results. Fraud occurs when loopholes are identified and exploited by the fraudsters. The implementers of election services (i.e., Arizona Counties) are better positioned to detect fraud and assess the risk of fraud because they are handling the data, not the state. Hence, governance gaps may be identified from patterns of poor assessment and response to risk with respect to election fraud and information security.

			===== [[Dropbox Collection (2020)\|Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020)]] =====
			Governance issues identified from Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County Election Department - Drop Box Collections issues. Section 2 of the AZ AG's inspector's report identifies numerous issues, which present risk to potential fraud. The Arizona Senate's allegations of inappropriate drop box actions and behaviors were confirmed by the AZ AG's inspector.

			* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Allegations Confirmed\|Deviation: Allegations Confirmed]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.

			The prior Green Book Attribute [[8.08]] c

			* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Missing Entries on Election Forms\|Deviation: Missing Entries on Election Forms]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
			* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Missing Ballot Counts\|Deviation: Missing Ballot Counts]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
			* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Used Email instead of EVBTS Forms\|Deviation: Used Email instead of EVBTS Forms]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
			* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Unfulfilled Party Representation Requirement for Couriers.\|Deviation: Unfulfilled Party Representation Requirements for Couriers]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
			* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Fictious Addresses in the MC Voter Registration Database\|Deviation: Fictious Addresses in MC Voter Registration Database]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
			*
			* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Noteworthy: Consequences Unknown\|Noteworthy: Consequences Unknown]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage
			* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Noteworthy: Transmission of USPS Data to MC and Runbeck\|Noteworthy: Transmission of USPS Data to MC and Runbeck]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage

	===== [[Signature Verification\|Maricopa County Signature Verification (2020)]] =====		===== [[Signature Verification\|Maricopa County Signature Verification (2020)]] =====