8.13 - Revision history

Neil thibodaux: /* The Anomalies */

2026-08-25T16:12:09Z

The Anomalies

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:12, 25 August 2026
Line 14:		Line 14:
	No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.		No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.

	===~~= The~~ Anomalies ====		=== Election Anomalies ===
	~~No examples~~ are ~~available~~ to ~~illustrate~~ governance gaps ~~for this attribute~~.		The Green Book's Principle 8 addresses Assess Fraud, Improper Payment, and Information Security Risk. Obviously, improper payments is not a concern during the Assessment of Election Anomalies. However, improper payments by MC county may exist, but would require a separate assessment.

			The Green Book's emphasis on fraud and information security as separate risk assessment activity is intentional. MC may be able to defer to the Arizona Secretary of State's Election Procedure Manual as general steps taken to ensure the integrity of election results. Fraud occurs when loopholes are identified and exploited by the fraudsters. The implementers of election services (i.e., Arizona Counties) are better positioned to detect fraud and assess the risk of fraud because they are handling the data, not the state. Hence, governance gaps may be identified from patterns of poor assessment and response to risk with respect to election fraud and information security.

Neil thibodaux: /* Election Anomalies */

2026-08-22T04:58:05Z

Election Anomalies

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:58, 21 August 2026
Line 14:		Line 14:
	No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.		No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.

	==== ~~Election~~ Anomalies ====		==== The Anomalies ====
	No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.		No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.

Neil thibodaux at 04:57, 22 August 2026

2026-08-22T04:57:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:57, 21 August 2026
Line 8:		Line 8:
	* '''[[Index of Attributes]]'''		* '''[[Index of Attributes]]'''
	* '''Previous Attribute - [[8.12]]'''		* '''Previous Attribute - [[8.12]]'''
	* '''Next Attribute - 8.15'''		* '''Next Attribute - [[8.14]]'''
	__FORCETOC__		__FORCETOC__

Neil thibodaux at 04:56, 22 August 2026

2026-08-22T04:56:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:56, 21 August 2026
Line 7:		Line 7:
	'''>>>Navigational Buttons<<<'''		'''>>>Navigational Buttons<<<'''
	* '''[[Index of Attributes]]'''		* '''[[Index of Attributes]]'''
	* '''Previous Attribute - ?'''		* '''Previous Attribute - [[8.12]]'''
	* '''Next Attribute - ?'''		* '''Next Attribute - 8.15'''
	__FORCETOC__		__FORCETOC__

	=== '''No ~~Examples'''~~ ===		=== Jamie's Story ===
			No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.

			==== Election Anomalies ====
			No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.

Neil thibodaux at 22:33, 15 August 2026

2026-08-15T22:33:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:33, 15 August 2026
Line 4:		Line 4:

	'''Attribute''' '''8.13''' - Management considers existing improper payment estimates, if available, when determining the significance of risks and the effectiveness of the internal control system in responding to improper payment risks. These estimates may come from management's annual improper payment estimates as part of its monitoring activities, which may be mandated by law. Management may also develop estimates more frequently than mandated by law, such as for programs that are new, substantially changed, or rapidly implemented to facilitate a timely risk assessment.		'''Attribute''' '''8.13''' - Management considers existing improper payment estimates, if available, when determining the significance of risks and the effectiveness of the internal control system in responding to improper payment risks. These estimates may come from management's annual improper payment estimates as part of its monitoring activities, which may be mandated by law. Management may also develop estimates more frequently than mandated by law, such as for programs that are new, substantially changed, or rapidly implemented to facilitate a timely risk assessment.

			'''>>>Navigational Buttons<<<'''
			* '''[[Index of Attributes]]'''
			* '''Previous Attribute - ?'''
			* '''Next Attribute - ?'''
			__FORCETOC__

			=== '''No Examples''' ===

Neil thibodaux: Created page with "'''Risk Assessment''' '''Principle 8 - Assess Fraud, Improper Payment, and Information Security Risk''' '''Attribute''' '''8.13''' - Management considers existing improper payment estimates, if available, when determining the significance of risks and the effectiveness of the internal control system in responding to improper payment risks. These estimates may come from management's annual improper payment estimates as part of its monitoring activities, which may be man..."

2026-08-15T22:20:14Z

Created page with "'''Risk Assessment''' '''Principle 8 - Assess Fraud, Improper Payment, and Information Security Risk''' '''Attribute''' '''8.13''' - Management considers existing improper payment estimates, if available, when determining the significance of risks and the effectiveness of the internal control system in responding to improper payment risks. These estimates may come from management's annual improper payment estimates as part of its monitoring activities, which may be man..."

New page

'''Risk Assessment'''

'''Principle 8 - Assess Fraud, Improper Payment, and Information Security Risk'''

'''Attribute''' '''8.13''' - Management considers existing improper payment estimates, if available, when determining the significance of risks and the effectiveness of the internal control system in responding to improper payment risks. These estimates may come from management's annual improper payment estimates as part of its monitoring activities, which may be mandated by law. Management may also develop estimates more frequently than mandated by law, such as for programs that are new, substantially changed, or rapidly implemented to facilitate a timely risk assessment.