MC EMS 2020 - Missing Ballot Images - Revision history

Neil thibodaux: /* Potential Governance Gap(s): */

2026-08-31T21:34:33Z

Potential Governance Gap(s):

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:34, 31 August 2026
Line 36:		Line 36:

	* Principle 1 - Demonstrate Commitment to Integrity and Ethical Values		* Principle 1 - Demonstrate Commitment to Integrity and Ethical Values
	** Attribute(s):		** Attribute(s): [[1.01]], [[1.02]], [[1.04]], [[1.05]], [[1.08]]
	* Principle 2 - Exercise Oversight Responsibility		* Principle 2 - Exercise Oversight Responsibility
	** Attribute(s):		** Attribute(s): [[2.01]]
	* Principle 3 - Establish Structure, Responsibility, and Authority		* Principle 3 - Establish Structure, Responsibility, and Authority
	** Attribute(s):		** Attribute(s): [[3.09]], [[3.10]]
	* Principle 4 - Demonstrate Commitment to Competence		* Principle 4 - Demonstrate Commitment to Competence
	** Attribute(s):		** Attribute(s):
Line 48:		Line 48:
	** Attribute(s):		** Attribute(s):
	* Principle 7 - Identify, Analyze, and Respond to Risks		* Principle 7 - Identify, Analyze, and Respond to Risks
	** Attribute(s):		** Attribute(s): [[7.05]], [[7.06]], [[7.09]], [[7.15]]
	* Principle 8 - Assess Fraud, Improper Payment, and Information		* Principle 8 - Assess Fraud, Improper Payment, and Information
	** Attribute(s):		** Attribute(s): [[8.01]], [[8.02]], [[8.03]], [[8.04]], [[8.05]], [[8.06]], [[8.10]], [[8.14]], [[8.15]]
	* Principle 9 - Identify, Analyze, and Respond to Change		* Principle 9 - Identify, Analyze, and Respond to Change
	** Attribute(s):		** Attribute(s):
	* Principle 10 - Design Control Activities		* Principle 10 - Design Control Activities
	** Attribute(s):		** Attribute(s): [[10.01]], [[10.18]], [[10.19]]
	* Principle 11 - Design General Control Activities over Information		* Principle 11 - Design General Control Activities over Information
	** Attribute(s):		** Attribute(s): [[11.02]], [[11.07]], [[11.09]], [[11.10]], [[11.11]]
	* Principle 12 - Implement Control Activities		* Principle 12 - Implement Control Activities
	** Attribute(s):		** Attribute(s): [[12.01]], [[12.02]], [[12.03]]
	* Principle 13 - Use Quality Information		* Principle 13 - Use Quality Information
	** Attribute(s):		** Attribute(s):
Line 64:		Line 64:
	** Attribute(s):		** Attribute(s):
	* Principle 15 - Communicate Externally		* Principle 15 - Communicate Externally
	** Attribute(s):		** Attribute(s): [[15.02]], [[15.09]]
	* Principle 16 - Perform Monitoring Activities		* Principle 16 - Perform Monitoring Activities
	** Attribute(s):		** Attribute(s): [[16.09]], [[16.10]]
	* Principle 17 - Evaluate Issues and Remediate Deficiencies		* Principle 17 - Evaluate Issues and Remediate Deficiencies
	** Attribute(s):		** Attribute(s): [[17.01]], [[17.02]], [[17.03]], [[17.04]], [[17.05]], [[17.06]], [[17.08]]

Neil thibodaux: /* Allegation */

2026-08-31T21:33:56Z

Allegation

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 Governance gaps were identified from Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation of Arizona Senate allegations #3 Maricopa County Election Department - Election Management Server (EMS) issues, which consisted of ten separate allegations. MC EMS 2020 - Election Management System Database Purged is an assessment of one of the ten sub-allegations associated with the EMS.
-=== Allegation ===
+===== Allegation =====
 === Potential Governance Gap(s): ===

Neil thibodaux at 19:25, 31 August 2026

2026-08-31T19:25:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:25, 31 August 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
			In your exploration of election-related anomalies, you are here:

			* List of [[The Anomalies\|Election Anomalies]]
			** [https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf Arizona Attorney General's Inspector's report of Arizona Senate of Allegations]
			*** Allegation [[Maricopa Election Management Server (2020)\|#3: Maricopa County Election Department - Election Management System]]----[Click for [[Dropbox Collection (2020)\|Allegation #2]] or Allegation #4]
			**** Sub-allegation '''#4 - Missing Ballot Images''' ---- [Click for [[MC EMS 2020 - Corrupt Ballot Images\|Sub-allegation #3]] or [[MC EMS 2020 - Failure to Follow Basic Cyber Security Practices\|Sub-allegation #5]]]

	This page seeks to explain potential governance gaps with respect to allegations from the Arizona Senate, specifically for allegation #3 Maricopa County Election Department - Election Management System anomalies. These were investigated by the Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation Report. This topic is listed on [[The Anomalies\|'''Election Anomalies''']] page, which lists various election-related anomalies that illustrate poor governance.		This page seeks to explain potential governance gaps with respect to allegations from the Arizona Senate, specifically for allegation #3 Maricopa County Election Department - Election Management System anomalies. These were investigated by the Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation Report. This topic is listed on [[The Anomalies\|'''Election Anomalies''']] page, which lists various election-related anomalies that illustrate poor governance.

Neil thibodaux at 16:27, 27 August 2026

2026-08-27T16:27:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:27, 27 August 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	''Governance Gaps'' are reported on and compared to a standard so that you may visualize how poorly managed County services can have an adverse impact without any criminal wrongdoing. We chose the United States Government Accountability Office's (GAO) ''Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government'' (also known as the ''Green Book'') because it represents the ideal standard for governance practices since it is specifically written for government entities, not the business sector. Maricopa County has no obligation or commitments to adhere to any governance-related standards, including the Green Book. Regardless, the Green Book is a representation of what good governance looks like and deviations from that standard are worthy of consideration, not prosecution.		''Governance Gaps'' are reported on and compared to a standard so that you may visualize how poorly managed County services can have an adverse impact without any criminal wrongdoing. We chose the United States Government Accountability Office's (GAO) ''Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government'' (also known as the ''Green Book'') because it represents the ideal standard for governance practices since it is specifically written for government entities, not the business sector. Maricopa County has no obligation or commitments to adhere to any governance-related standards, including the Green Book. Regardless, the Green Book is a representation of what good governance looks like and deviations from that standard are worthy of consideration, not prosecution.
	The Governance Gap Assessment Team are not IT security experts. The technical aspects of the IT configuration are not being disputed. The assessment for governance gaps sought to understand how data and information was being treated with respect to the US GAO's Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government.		The Governance Gap Assessment Team are not IT security experts. The technical aspects of the IT configuration are not being disputed. The assessment for governance gaps sought to understand how data and information was being treated with respect to the US GAO's Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government.

			=== [[Maricopa Election Management Server (2020)]] ===
			Governance issues identified from Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County Election Department - Election Management Server (EMS) issues.

			==== MC EMS 2020 - Missing Ballot Images ====
			Governance gaps were identified from Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation of Arizona Senate allegations #3 Maricopa County Election Department - Election Management Server (EMS) issues, which consisted of ten separate allegations. MC EMS 2020 - Election Management System Database Purged is an assessment of one of the ten sub-allegations associated with the EMS.

			=== Allegation ===

			=== Potential Governance Gap(s): ===

			* Principle 1 - Demonstrate Commitment to Integrity and Ethical Values
			** Attribute(s):
			* Principle 2 - Exercise Oversight Responsibility
			** Attribute(s):
			* Principle 3 - Establish Structure, Responsibility, and Authority
			** Attribute(s):
			* Principle 4 - Demonstrate Commitment to Competence
			** Attribute(s):
			* Principle 5 - Enforce Accountability
			** Attribute(s):
			* Principle 6 - Define Objectives and Risk Tolerances
			** Attribute(s):
			* Principle 7 - Identify, Analyze, and Respond to Risks
			** Attribute(s):
			* Principle 8 - Assess Fraud, Improper Payment, and Information
			** Attribute(s):
			* Principle 9 - Identify, Analyze, and Respond to Change
			** Attribute(s):
			* Principle 10 - Design Control Activities
			** Attribute(s):
			* Principle 11 - Design General Control Activities over Information
			** Attribute(s):
			* Principle 12 - Implement Control Activities
			** Attribute(s):
			* Principle 13 - Use Quality Information
			** Attribute(s):
			* Principle 14 - Communicate Internally
			** Attribute(s):
			* Principle 15 - Communicate Externally
			** Attribute(s):
			* Principle 16 - Perform Monitoring Activities
			** Attribute(s):
			* Principle 17 - Evaluate Issues and Remediate Deficiencies
			** Attribute(s):

Neil thibodaux at 15:48, 27 August 2026

2026-08-27T15:48:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:48, 27 August 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	xx		This page seeks to explain potential governance gaps with respect to allegations from the Arizona Senate, specifically for allegation #3 Maricopa County Election Department - Election Management System anomalies. These were investigated by the Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation Report. This topic is listed on [[The Anomalies\|'''Election Anomalies''']] page, which lists various election-related anomalies that illustrate poor governance.

			''Governance Gaps'' are reported on and compared to a standard so that you may visualize how poorly managed County services can have an adverse impact without any criminal wrongdoing. We chose the United States Government Accountability Office's (GAO) ''Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government'' (also known as the ''Green Book'') because it represents the ideal standard for governance practices since it is specifically written for government entities, not the business sector. Maricopa County has no obligation or commitments to adhere to any governance-related standards, including the Green Book. Regardless, the Green Book is a representation of what good governance looks like and deviations from that standard are worthy of consideration, not prosecution.
			The Governance Gap Assessment Team are not IT security experts. The technical aspects of the IT configuration are not being disputed. The assessment for governance gaps sought to understand how data and information was being treated with respect to the US GAO's Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government.

Neil thibodaux: Created page with "xx"

2026-08-27T15:34:16Z

Created page with "xx"

New page