Signature Verification - Revision history

Neil thibodaux: /* Wait! Did I read this wrong or what? */

2026-08-19T16:11:08Z

Wait! Did I read this wrong or what?

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:11, 19 August 2026
Line 64:		Line 64:
	** Attribute(s): 5.01Note: can't assess performance because the of the single-person vulnerability, Never will no if they are doing a good or bad job.		** Attribute(s): 5.01Note: can't assess performance because the of the single-person vulnerability, Never will no if they are doing a good or bad job.
	* Principle 6 - Define Objectives and Risk Tolerances		* Principle 6 - Define Objectives and Risk Tolerances
	** Attrubute: 6.02 (can't measure SV performance 6.04 6.07 6.08		** Attrubute(s): 6.02 (can't measure SV performance 6.04 6.07 6.08
	**		* Principle 8 - Assess Fraud, Improper Payment, and Informati<big>on</big>
	**		** Attribute(s):
	=== Signature Verifier Training Investigation ===		=== Signature Verifier Training Investigation ===
	A criminal investigation was initiated by the Arizona Attorney General (AG) in response to seven issues identified by the Arizona Senate 2020 General Election Forensic Audit for Maricopa County Elections on September 24, 2021. One of the issues to be investigated was titled "Maricopa County Elections Department - Signature Verification Process." The Arizona Attorney General’s (AG) Office issued a report, which is titled ''[https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf 2020 General Election Investigation].'' The investigation of the Signature Verification Training resulted in the following: <u>Finding</u> - No improper Election Procedures were discovered during the Signature Verification Training.		A criminal investigation was initiated by the Arizona Attorney General (AG) in response to seven issues identified by the Arizona Senate 2020 General Election Forensic Audit for Maricopa County Elections on September 24, 2021. One of the issues to be investigated was titled "Maricopa County Elections Department - Signature Verification Process." The Arizona Attorney General’s (AG) Office issued a report, which is titled ''[https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf 2020 General Election Investigation].'' The investigation of the Signature Verification Training resulted in the following: <u>Finding</u> - No improper Election Procedures were discovered during the Signature Verification Training.
Line 127:		Line 127:
	** Attribute(s): 5.03 (no oversight)		** Attribute(s): 5.03 (no oversight)
	* Principle 7 - Identify, Analyze, and Respond to Risks		* Principle 7 - Identify, Analyze, and Respond to Risks
	** Attribute(s): 7.05		** Attribute(s): 7.05 (doc no training decision)

	=== Possible Personal Performance Deficiencies Unrelated to Training ===		=== Possible Personal Performance Deficiencies Unrelated to Training ===

Neil thibodaux: /* Wait! Did I read this wrong or what? */

2026-08-19T15:46:18Z

Wait! Did I read this wrong or what?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:46, 19 August 2026
Line 126:		Line 126:
	* Principle 5 - Enforce Accountability		* Principle 5 - Enforce Accountability
	** Attribute(s): 5.03 (no oversight)		** Attribute(s): 5.03 (no oversight)
			* Principle 7 - Identify, Analyze, and Respond to Risks
			** Attribute(s): 7.05

	=== Possible Personal Performance Deficiencies Unrelated to Training ===		=== Possible Personal Performance Deficiencies Unrelated to Training ===

Neil thibodaux: /* Quantity of Training */

2026-08-19T04:41:33Z

Quantity of Training

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:41, 19 August 2026
Line 64:		Line 64:
	** Attribute(s): 5.01Note: can't assess performance because the of the single-person vulnerability, Never will no if they are doing a good or bad job.		** Attribute(s): 5.01Note: can't assess performance because the of the single-person vulnerability, Never will no if they are doing a good or bad job.
	* Principle 6 - Define Objectives and Risk Tolerances		* Principle 6 - Define Objectives and Risk Tolerances
	** Attrubute: 6.02 (can't measure SV performance 6.04 6.07		** Attrubute: 6.02 (can't measure SV performance 6.04 6.07 6.08
			**
	**		**
	=== Signature Verifier Training Investigation ===		=== Signature Verifier Training Investigation ===
Line 141:		Line 142:
	Principle 6 - Define Objectives and Risk Tolerances		Principle 6 - Define Objectives and Risk Tolerances

	* Attrubute: 6.02 (can't measure SV performance 6.04 6.07		* Attrubute: 6.02 (can't measure SV performance 6.04 6.07 6.08

Neil thibodaux: /* Signature Verifier Training Investigation */

2026-08-19T04:39:40Z

Signature Verifier Training Investigation

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:39, 19 August 2026
Line 62:		Line 62:
	<u>Potential Governance Gaps:</u>		<u>Potential Governance Gaps:</u>
	* Principle 5 - Enforce Accountability		* Principle 5 - Enforce Accountability
	** Attribute(s): 5.01		** Attribute(s): 5.01Note: can't assess performance because the of the single-person vulnerability, Never will no if they are doing a good or bad job.
	~~Note~~: can't assess performance because the of the single-person vulnerability, Never will no if they are doing a good or bad job.		* Principle 6 - Define Objectives and Risk Tolerances
			** Attrubute: 6.02 (can't measure SV performance 6.04 6.07
			**
	=== Signature Verifier Training Investigation ===		=== Signature Verifier Training Investigation ===
	A criminal investigation was initiated by the Arizona Attorney General (AG) in response to seven issues identified by the Arizona Senate 2020 General Election Forensic Audit for Maricopa County Elections on September 24, 2021. One of the issues to be investigated was titled "Maricopa County Elections Department - Signature Verification Process." The Arizona Attorney General’s (AG) Office issued a report, which is titled ''[https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf 2020 General Election Investigation].'' The investigation of the Signature Verification Training resulted in the following: <u>Finding</u> - No improper Election Procedures were discovered during the Signature Verification Training.		A criminal investigation was initiated by the Arizona Attorney General (AG) in response to seven issues identified by the Arizona Senate 2020 General Election Forensic Audit for Maricopa County Elections on September 24, 2021. One of the issues to be investigated was titled "Maricopa County Elections Department - Signature Verification Process." The Arizona Attorney General’s (AG) Office issued a report, which is titled ''[https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf 2020 General Election Investigation].'' The investigation of the Signature Verification Training resulted in the following: <u>Finding</u> - No improper Election Procedures were discovered during the Signature Verification Training.
Line 125:		Line 126:
	** Attribute(s): 5.03 (no oversight)		** Attribute(s): 5.03 (no oversight)

	=== Personal Performance Deficiencies Unrelated to Training ===		=== Possible Personal Performance Deficiencies Unrelated to Training ===
	Level 1 Signature Verifiers may mis fraudulent signatures for issues unrelated to training, which include the following:		Level 1 Signature Verifiers may mis fraudulent signatures for issues unrelated to training, which include the following:

Line 137:		Line 138:

	<u>Potential Governance Gaps:</u>		<u>Potential Governance Gaps:</u>

			Principle 6 - Define Objectives and Risk Tolerances

			* Attrubute: 6.02 (can't measure SV performance 6.04 6.07

Neil thibodaux: /* Personal Performance Deficiencies Unrelated to Training */

2026-08-19T04:31:41Z

Personal Performance Deficiencies Unrelated to Training

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:31, 19 August 2026
Line 86:		Line 86:

	==== Proficiency Objective ====		==== Proficiency Objective ====
	A training model called [[wikipedia:Bloom's_taxonomy\|Blooms Taxonomy]] is used during the design and development of training so the student can perform the new task to the desired level of proficiency. In this case, the student would need to have become proficient in Signature Verifier ''knowledge'' and ''comprehension'' before acquiring proficiency with ''application,'' which seems to be the appropriate competency level for a Signature Verifier. <u>Potential Governance Gaps:</u>		A training model called [[wikipedia:Bloom's_taxonomy\|Blooms Taxonomy]] is used during the design and development of training so the student can perform the new task to the desired level of proficiency. In this case, the student would need to have become proficient in Signature Verifier ''knowledge'' and ''comprehension'' before acquiring proficiency with ''application,'' which seems to be the appropriate competency level for a Signature Verifier.

			<u>Potential Governance Gaps:</u>
	* Principle 4 - Demonstrate Commitment to Competence		* Principle 4 - Demonstrate Commitment to Competence
	** Attribute(s): 4.02		** Attribute(s): 4.02

	==== Verifying the Student's Completion of Training ====		==== Verifying the Student's Completion of Training ====
	The inspector interviewed an Elections Department to determine if all the Level 1 Signature Verifiers had completed the training. Apparently, there were no training documents created or retained to provide objective evidence of training attendance. <u>Potential Governance Gaps:</u>		The inspector interviewed an Elections Department to determine if all the Level 1 Signature Verifiers had completed the training. Apparently, there were no training documents created or retained to provide objective evidence of training attendance.
	* Principle 4 - Demonstrate Commitment to Competence
			<u>Potential Governance Gaps:</u>
			* Principle 3 - Establish Structure, Responsibility, and Authority
			** Attribute(s): 3.09, (no documentation) Principle 4 - Demonstrate Commitment to Competence
	** Attribute(s): 4.02		** Attribute(s): 4.02

Line 117:		Line 122:
	* Principle 4 - Demonstrate Commitment to Competence		* Principle 4 - Demonstrate Commitment to Competence
	** Attribute(s): 4.02, 4.04, 4.05		** Attribute(s): 4.02, 4.04, 4.05
			* Principle 5 - Enforce Accountability
			** Attribute(s): 5.03 (no oversight)

	=== Personal Performance Deficiencies Unrelated to Training ===		=== Personal Performance Deficiencies Unrelated to Training ===

Neil thibodaux: /* Wait! Did I read this wrong or what? */

2026-08-19T04:26:44Z

Wait! Did I read this wrong or what?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:26, 19 August 2026
Line 60:		Line 60:
	* The competency of person performing the verification.		* The competency of person performing the verification.
	* Conditions at home or at work that may increase the likelihood of verification errors.		* Conditions at home or at work that may increase the likelihood of verification errors.
			<u>Potential Governance Gaps:</u>
			* Principle 5 - Enforce Accountability
			** Attribute(s): 5.01
			Note: can't assess performance because the of the single-person vulnerability, Never will no if they are doing a good or bad job.

	=== Signature Verifier Training Investigation ===		=== Signature Verifier Training Investigation ===
Line 77:		Line 81:

	==== Pace of Training ====		==== Pace of Training ====
	The two hours of Level 1 training consisted of 41 slides, which results in a average pace of less than three minutes per slide.		The two hours of Level 1 training consisted of 41 slides, which results in a average pace of less than three minutes per slide. <u>Potential Governance Gaps:</u>
			* Principle 4 - Demonstrate Commitment to Competence
			** Attribute(s): 4.02

	==== Proficiency Objective ====		==== Proficiency Objective ====
	A training model called [[wikipedia:Bloom's_taxonomy\|Blooms Taxonomy]] is used during the design and development of training so the student can perform the new task to the desired level of proficiency. In this case, the student would need to have become proficient in Signature Verifier ''knowledge'' and ''comprehension'' before acquiring proficiency with ''application,'' which seems to be the appropriate competency level for a Signature Verifier.		A training model called [[wikipedia:Bloom's_taxonomy\|Blooms Taxonomy]] is used during the design and development of training so the student can perform the new task to the desired level of proficiency. In this case, the student would need to have become proficient in Signature Verifier ''knowledge'' and ''comprehension'' before acquiring proficiency with ''application,'' which seems to be the appropriate competency level for a Signature Verifier. <u>Potential Governance Gaps:</u>
			* Principle 4 - Demonstrate Commitment to Competence
			** Attribute(s): 4.02

	==== Verifying the Student's Completion of Training ====		==== Verifying the Student's Completion of Training ====
	The inspector interviewed an Elections Department to determine if all the Level 1 Signature Verifiers had completed the training. Apparently, there were no training documents created or retained to provide objective evidence of training attendance.		The inspector interviewed an Elections Department to determine if all the Level 1 Signature Verifiers had completed the training. Apparently, there were no training documents created or retained to provide objective evidence of training attendance. <u>Potential Governance Gaps:</u>
			* Principle 4 - Demonstrate Commitment to Competence
			** Attribute(s): 4.02

	==== Verification the Competency of the Student ====		==== Verification the Competency of the Student ====
	No evidence was provided in the inspector's report to suggest Signature Verification competency was verified. The were apparently no test scores for each student. Test scores would have been a more objective method of confirming student attendance than an interview with a manager (see above). A final examination is not noted as a training topic the investigator included in the report.		No evidence was provided in the inspector's report to suggest Signature Verification competency was verified. The were apparently no test scores for each student. Test scores would have been a more objective method of confirming student attendance than an interview with a manager (see above). A final examination is not noted as a training topic the investigator included in the report. <u>Potential Governance Gaps:</u>
			* Principle 4 - Demonstrate Commitment to Competence
			** Attribute(s): 4.02

	==== Verification of Student Competency in the Work Setting ====		==== Verification of Student Competency in the Work Setting ====
	The inspector stated the Level 1 Signature Verifiers are expected to complete, on average, one verification every seven seconds. If seven seconds if the average rate, some verifications need to be completed in less than seven seconds. A valid competency training examination would have needed to replicate this astounding pace for an extended period time given that the pace would be expected for an eight-hour shift, maybe longer based on information the inspector included in his report.		The inspector stated the Level 1 Signature Verifiers are expected to complete, on average, one verification every seven seconds. If seven seconds if the average rate, some verifications need to be completed in less than seven seconds. A valid competency training examination would have needed to replicate this astounding pace for an extended period time given that the pace would be expected for an eight-hour shift, maybe longer based on information the inspector included in his report. <u>Potential Governance Gaps:</u>
			* Principle 4 - Demonstrate Commitment to Competence
			** Attribute(s): 4.02

	==== Wait! Did I read this wrong or what? ====		==== Wait! Did I read this wrong or what? ====
Line 99:		Line 113:

	This assessment is focused on County governance, so the question is why did the County feel that it was acceptable to hire 40 temporary workers and not provide them with training?		This assessment is focused on County governance, so the question is why did the County feel that it was acceptable to hire 40 temporary workers and not provide them with training?

			Why were more temporary employees used to perform a critical single-person vulnerability task as Level 1 Signature Verifiers? <u>Potential Governance Gaps:</u>
			* Principle 4 - Demonstrate Commitment to Competence
			** Attribute(s): 4.02, 4.04, 4.05

	=== Personal Performance Deficiencies Unrelated to Training ===		=== Personal Performance Deficiencies Unrelated to Training ===

Neil thibodaux: /* Wait! Did I read this wrong or what? */

2026-08-19T04:16:00Z

Wait! Did I read this wrong or what?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:16, 19 August 2026
Line 69:		Line 69:
	The Level 1 Signature Verifier is the one person that allows a fraudulent ballot to be counted if they do not detect a mismatched signature; the Level 1 Signature Verifier gets two hours of training.		The Level 1 Signature Verifier is the one person that allows a fraudulent ballot to be counted if they do not detect a mismatched signature; the Level 1 Signature Verifier gets two hours of training.

	If flagged by a Level 1 Signature Verifier, the ''suspect'' early ballot is then directed to the Level II Signature Verifiers, where alternative methods to authenticate the ballot may be applied. Eight hours of training are provided to Level II Signature Verifies and they are not a "single-person-vulnerability." Level II Signature Verifiers may involve other ~~people~~ but a Level 1 is performing their task independently.		If flagged by a Level 1 Signature Verifier, the ''suspect'' early ballot is then directed to the Level II Signature Verifiers, where alternative methods to authenticate the ballot may be applied. Eight hours of training are provided to Level II Signature Verifies and they are not a "single-person-vulnerability." Level II Signature Verifiers may involve other staff for assistance, but a Level 1 is performing their task independently.

			<u>Potential Governance Gaps:</u>

			* Principle 4 - Demonstrate Commitment to Competence
			** Attribute(s): 4.02

	==== Pace of Training ====		==== Pace of Training ====
Line 93:		Line 98:
	Apparently, the 40 new hires did not receive any training since they were hired after the training was provided. If true, there were more untrained Level 1 Signature Verifiers than trained Level 1's given that 33 employees completed the training in June.		Apparently, the 40 new hires did not receive any training since they were hired after the training was provided. If true, there were more untrained Level 1 Signature Verifiers than trained Level 1's given that 33 employees completed the training in June.

	~~==== Summary of Potential Governance Gaps Relating~~ to ~~Training ====~~		This assessment is focused on County governance, so the question is why did the County feel that it was acceptable to hire 40 temporary workers and not provide them with training?
	~~<u>Potential Governance Gaps:</u>~~

	=== Personal Performance Deficiencies Unrelated to Training ===		=== Personal Performance Deficiencies Unrelated to Training ===

Neil thibodaux: /* Verification of Student Competency in the Work Setting */

2026-08-19T04:03:49Z

Verification of Student Competency in the Work Setting

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:03, 19 August 2026
Line 85:		Line 85:
	==== Verification of Student Competency in the Work Setting ====		==== Verification of Student Competency in the Work Setting ====
	The inspector stated the Level 1 Signature Verifiers are expected to complete, on average, one verification every seven seconds. If seven seconds if the average rate, some verifications need to be completed in less than seven seconds. A valid competency training examination would have needed to replicate this astounding pace for an extended period time given that the pace would be expected for an eight-hour shift, maybe longer based on information the inspector included in his report.		The inspector stated the Level 1 Signature Verifiers are expected to complete, on average, one verification every seven seconds. If seven seconds if the average rate, some verifications need to be completed in less than seven seconds. A valid competency training examination would have needed to replicate this astounding pace for an extended period time given that the pace would be expected for an eight-hour shift, maybe longer based on information the inspector included in his report.

			==== Wait! Did I read this wrong or what? ====
			The inspector makes the statement, "This new training was provided in June 2020 prior to the General Election."

			Later, the inspector makes the statement, "According to the Maricopa Elections Department, an additional group of 40 temporary employees were hired from October 30th 2020 to November 6th 2020 to assist with Signature Verification and ballot curing.

			Apparently, the 40 new hires did not receive any training since they were hired after the training was provided. If true, there were more untrained Level 1 Signature Verifiers than trained Level 1's given that 33 employees completed the training in June.

	==== Summary of Potential Governance Gaps Relating to Training ====		==== Summary of Potential Governance Gaps Relating to Training ====

Neil thibodaux: /* Conceptual Importance of Signature Verification */

2026-08-19T03:49:44Z

Conceptual Importance of Signature Verification

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:49, 19 August 2026
Line 61:		Line 61:
	* Conditions at home or at work that may increase the likelihood of verification errors.		* Conditions at home or at work that may increase the likelihood of verification errors.

	=== Signature Verifier ~~Competency~~ ===		=== Signature Verifier Training Investigation ===
	A criminal investigation was initiated by the Arizona Attorney General (AG) in response to seven issues identified by the Arizona Senate 2020 General Election Forensic Audit for Maricopa County Elections on September 24, 2021. One of the issues to be investigated was titled "Maricopa County Elections Department - Signature Verification Process." The Arizona Attorney General’s (AG) Office issued a report, which is titled ''[https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf 2020 General Election Investigation].'' The investigation of the Signature Verification Training resulted in the following: <u>Finding</u> - No improper Election Procedures were discovered during the Signature Verification Training.		A criminal investigation was initiated by the Arizona Attorney General (AG) in response to seven issues identified by the Arizona Senate 2020 General Election Forensic Audit for Maricopa County Elections on September 24, 2021. One of the issues to be investigated was titled "Maricopa County Elections Department - Signature Verification Process." The Arizona Attorney General’s (AG) Office issued a report, which is titled ''[https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf 2020 General Election Investigation].'' The investigation of the Signature Verification Training resulted in the following: <u>Finding</u> - No improper Election Procedures were discovered during the Signature Verification Training.

Line 86:		Line 86:
	The inspector stated the Level 1 Signature Verifiers are expected to complete, on average, one verification every seven seconds. If seven seconds if the average rate, some verifications need to be completed in less than seven seconds. A valid competency training examination would have needed to replicate this astounding pace for an extended period time given that the pace would be expected for an eight-hour shift, maybe longer based on information the inspector included in his report.		The inspector stated the Level 1 Signature Verifiers are expected to complete, on average, one verification every seven seconds. If seven seconds if the average rate, some verifications need to be completed in less than seven seconds. A valid competency training examination would have needed to replicate this astounding pace for an extended period time given that the pace would be expected for an eight-hour shift, maybe longer based on information the inspector included in his report.

	=== ~~Susceptibility~~ to ~~Environmentally Induced Errors~~ ===		==== Summary of Potential Governance Gaps Relating to Training ====
	~~Fatigue (highly repetitive tasks, sleep, lack of breaks, etc.)~~		<u>Potential Governance Gaps:</u>

			=== Personal Performance Deficiencies Unrelated to Training ===
			Level 1 Signature Verifiers may mis fraudulent signatures for issues unrelated to training, which include the following:

	~~Differences between~~ wet and ~~digital signatures~~		* Quick pace - one signature verification per seven seconds is a quick pace (per investigation)
			* Duration of task - Signature Verifiers were expected to work eight-hour shifts sometimes longer
			* Fatigue - Doing a repetitive task at a quick pace for an extended duration
			* Clarity of the Voter Registration Signature - The signature may be a pen on paper (wet signature) or digital signature acquired from the Arizona Motor Vehicle Department's voter registration process
			* High rates of flagging signature mismatches may be culturally discouraged since suborinate Level 1 Signature Verifiers would be making more work for the Level II Signature Verifiers, which appears to be their leadership
			* Low rates of flagging signature mismatches may be culturally and personally rewarding since little consetration is needed if the personal standard is low and the Level II Signature Verifiers are unlikely to complain about getting fewer suspect early ballots.
			* Workload is increased with emphasis on the convenience of early voting and voter registration errors that generator more ballots than valid voters.

	~~=== Signature Verification Fraud ===~~		<u>Potential Governance Gaps:</u>

Neil thibodaux: /* Competency Verification */

2026-08-19T03:20:37Z

Competency Verification

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:20, 19 August 2026
Line 77:		Line 77:
	A training model called [[wikipedia:Bloom's_taxonomy\|Blooms Taxonomy]] is used during the design and development of training so the student can perform the new task to the desired level of proficiency. In this case, the student would need to have become proficient in Signature Verifier ''knowledge'' and ''comprehension'' before acquiring proficiency with ''application,'' which seems to be the appropriate competency level for a Signature Verifier.		A training model called [[wikipedia:Bloom's_taxonomy\|Blooms Taxonomy]] is used during the design and development of training so the student can perform the new task to the desired level of proficiency. In this case, the student would need to have become proficient in Signature Verifier ''knowledge'' and ''comprehension'' before acquiring proficiency with ''application,'' which seems to be the appropriate competency level for a Signature Verifier.

	==== Training ~~Verification~~ ====		==== Verifying the Student's Completion of Training ====
	The inspector interviewed an Elections Department to determine if all the Level 1 Signature Verifiers had completed the training. Apparently, there were no training documents created or retained to provide objective evidence of training attendance.		The inspector interviewed an Elections Department to determine if all the Level 1 Signature Verifiers had completed the training. Apparently, there were no training documents created or retained to provide objective evidence of training attendance.

	==== Competency Verification ====		==== Verification the Competency of the Student ====
	~~There slide topics do not~~		No evidence was provided in the inspector's report to suggest Signature Verification competency was verified. The were apparently no test scores for each student. Test scores would have been a more objective method of confirming student attendance than an interview with a manager (see above). A final examination is not noted as a training topic the investigator included in the report.

			==== Verification of Student Competency in the Work Setting ====
			The inspector stated the Level 1 Signature Verifiers are expected to complete, on average, one verification every seven seconds. If seven seconds if the average rate, some verifications need to be completed in less than seven seconds. A valid competency training examination would have needed to replicate this astounding pace for an extended period time given that the pace would be expected for an eight-hour shift, maybe longer based on information the inspector included in his report.

	=== Susceptibility to Environmentally Induced Errors ===		=== Susceptibility to Environmentally Induced Errors ===
	Fatigue (highly repetitive tasks, sleep, lack of breaks, etc.)		Fatigue (highly repetitive tasks, sleep, lack of breaks, etc.)

	~~Pace (seven seconds per verification~~

	Differences between wet and digital signatures		Differences between wet and digital signatures

	=== Signature Verification Fraud ===		=== Signature Verification Fraud ===