8.17: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
'''>>>Navigational Buttons<<<''' | '''>>>Navigational Buttons<<<''' | ||
* '''[[Index of Attributes]]''' | * '''[[Index of Attributes]]''' | ||
* '''Previous Attribute - | * '''Previous Attribute - [[8.16]]''' | ||
* '''Next Attribute - | * '''Next Attribute - [[8.18]]''' | ||
__FORCETOC__ | __FORCETOC__ | ||
=== ' | === Jamie's Story === | ||
No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute. | |||
=== Election Anomalies === | |||
The Green Book's Principle 8 addresses Assess Fraud, Improper Payment, and Information Security Risk. Obviously, improper payments is not a concern during the Assessment of Election Anomalies. However, improper payments by MC county may exist, but would require a separate assessment. | |||
The Green Book's emphasis on fraud and information security as separate risk assessment activity is intentional. MC may be able to defer to the Arizona Secretary of State's Election Procedure Manual as general steps taken to ensure the integrity of election results. Fraud occurs when loopholes are identified and exploited by the fraudsters. The implementers of election services (i.e., Arizona Counties) are better positioned to detect fraud and assess the risk of fraud because they are handling the data, not the state. Hence, governance gaps may be identified from patterns of poor assessment and response to risk with respect to election fraud and information security. | |||
Latest revision as of 09:13, 25 August 2026
Risk Assessment
Principle 8 - Assess Fraud, Improper Payment, and Information Security Risk
Attribute 8.17 - Management considers information security risk factors, which may include the following:
- the complexity of the entity's information technology;
- new or emerging technologies;
- information technology that may be outdated or incompatible with new technologies;
- decentralized operating systems and communications networks;
- external-party access to the entity's operating systems and communications networks;
- information technology personnel not having the knowledge, skills, or abilities to maintain the entity's information technology and respond to related risks; and
- personnel being unfamiliar with technology and related risks.
>>>Navigational Buttons<<<
- Index of Attributes
- Previous Attribute - 8.16
- Next Attribute - 8.18
Jamie's Story
No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.
Election Anomalies
The Green Book's Principle 8 addresses Assess Fraud, Improper Payment, and Information Security Risk. Obviously, improper payments is not a concern during the Assessment of Election Anomalies. However, improper payments by MC county may exist, but would require a separate assessment.
The Green Book's emphasis on fraud and information security as separate risk assessment activity is intentional. MC may be able to defer to the Arizona Secretary of State's Election Procedure Manual as general steps taken to ensure the integrity of election results. Fraud occurs when loopholes are identified and exploited by the fraudsters. The implementers of election services (i.e., Arizona Counties) are better positioned to detect fraud and assess the risk of fraud because they are handling the data, not the state. Hence, governance gaps may be identified from patterns of poor assessment and response to risk with respect to election fraud and information security.
