2.10: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* '''[[Index of Attributes]]''' | * '''[[Index of Attributes]]''' | ||
* '''Previous Attribute - | * '''Previous Attribute - [[2.09]]''' | ||
* '''Next Attribute - | * '''Next Attribute - [[2.11]]''' | ||
__FORCETOC__ | __FORCETOC__ | ||
=== ''' | === Jamie's Story === | ||
==== [[2021: My Journey Begins]] ==== | |||
I directed questions to the Maricopa County Recorder, expecting a response since this is an elected position. I incorrectly assumed that elected officials would be interested in addressing citizen concerns. There was a brief interface between me and the Maricopa County Recorder. However, there was no response to my inquiries. Maricopa County Recorder appeared to not value his oversight role. I also receive no responses from the Arizona Secretary of State, who provides oversight to all Arizona County elections. | |||
==== [[November 2022: Mid-term Election]] ==== | |||
Katie Hobbs appeared to be ineffective at overseeing Arizona's Elections given the unusually high number of Election Anomalies that occurred during the 2020 General Election and 2022 Mid-term Election. | |||
==== [[November 20, 2025: Debbie Lesko Presentation]] ==== | |||
Debbie Lesko provides an oversight role as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors (MCBOS). Her presentation of why two boxes of ballots could not be located for three days following a November 2025 election parroted the [https://elections.maricopa.gov/news-and-information/elections-news/november-statement-election-1172025.html Election's Department statement]from November 7, 2025. She seemed to be accepting of people not following procedures to place the boxes of ballots in an unauthorized location for transport and how fortuitous it was that they had coincidently been stored in an area with 24-hour surveillance. Hence, a person in an oversight role did not see the need to investigate the incident for the purpose of determining corrective actions to prevent recurrence. | |||
=== Election Anomalies === | |||
No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute. | |||
Latest revision as of 19:35, 11 September 2026
Control Environment
Principle 2 - Exercise Oversight Responsibility
Attribute 2.10 - These responsibilities are supported by the organizational structure that management establishes. The oversight body oversees management's design, implementation, and operation of the entity's organizational structure so that the processes necessary to enable the oversight body to fulfill its responsibilities exist and are operating effectively.
>>>Navigational Buttons<<<
- Index of Attributes
- Previous Attribute - 2.09
- Next Attribute - 2.11
Jamie's Story
I directed questions to the Maricopa County Recorder, expecting a response since this is an elected position. I incorrectly assumed that elected officials would be interested in addressing citizen concerns. There was a brief interface between me and the Maricopa County Recorder. However, there was no response to my inquiries. Maricopa County Recorder appeared to not value his oversight role. I also receive no responses from the Arizona Secretary of State, who provides oversight to all Arizona County elections.
Katie Hobbs appeared to be ineffective at overseeing Arizona's Elections given the unusually high number of Election Anomalies that occurred during the 2020 General Election and 2022 Mid-term Election.
Debbie Lesko provides an oversight role as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors (MCBOS). Her presentation of why two boxes of ballots could not be located for three days following a November 2025 election parroted the Election's Department statementfrom November 7, 2025. She seemed to be accepting of people not following procedures to place the boxes of ballots in an unauthorized location for transport and how fortuitous it was that they had coincidently been stored in an area with 24-hour surveillance. Hence, a person in an oversight role did not see the need to investigate the incident for the purpose of determining corrective actions to prevent recurrence.
Election Anomalies
No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.
