April 15, 2026, Evidentiary Hearing Set: Difference between revisions

From Arizona Citizen Voice
← Older edit

Neil thibodaux (talk | contribs)

2 user groups
2,850 edits
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''This is not ready for proofreading.'''
You are here: Poor Governance Data; Poor Governance Examples; Jamie's Example; '''April''' '''15, 2026, Evidentiary Hearing Set'''.<blockquote>The next part of Jamie's Story is [[June 1, 2026: Judge's Decision]] .</blockquote>
----On April 15, 2026, the Judge presiding over Jamie's case against Maricopa County for an inadequate response to her Public Records Request summarized the case and determines that an Evidentiary Hearing was necessary.


You are here: Poor Governance Data; Poor Governance Examples; Jamie's Example; '''April''' '''15, 2026, Evidentiary Hearing Set'''.<blockquote>The next part of Jamie's Story is [[June 1, 2026: Judge's Decision]] .</blockquote>
No governance gaps were identified from this Judiciary document since the content was a summary of my Plaintiff's Brief and the Defense Brief, which had already been addressed (See Jamie's Timeline, below). No new observations of Maricopa County practices or behaviors were noted.  
----On April 15, 2026, provided his initial thoughts on the case and determines that an Evidentiary Hearing is necessary.


=== Jamie's Timeline ===
=== Jamie's Timeline ===
{{Jamies_Timeline}}
=== Court Document ===
On April 14, 2026, the Arizona Superior Court for Maricopa County issued a document titled, [[Media:2026-04-14 Evidentiary Hearing Set.pdf|Evidentiary Hearing Set.]] This document provided some of the Judge's initial thoughts on the case based upon the briefings submitted by the Plaintiff and Defendants. A final decision would be made following the Evidentiary Hearing.

Latest revision as of 14:50, 14 September 2026

You are here: Poor Governance Data; Poor Governance Examples; Jamie's Example; April 15, 2026, Evidentiary Hearing Set.

The next part of Jamie's Story is June 1, 2026: Judge's Decision .

On April 15, 2026, the Judge presiding over Jamie's case against Maricopa County for an inadequate response to her Public Records Request summarized the case and determines that an Evidentiary Hearing was necessary.

No governance gaps were identified from this Judiciary document since the content was a summary of my Plaintiff's Brief and the Defense Brief, which had already been addressed (See Jamie's Timeline, below). No new observations of Maricopa County practices or behaviors were noted.

Jamie's Timeline

  1. 2020: General Election Anomalies — Maricopa County has numerous election anaomalies
  2. 2021: My Journey Begins — Starting to ask questions about lessons learned
  3. November 2022: Ethical Issues with Katie Hobbs Overseeing Her Own Election — As Arizona S.O.S., Katie Hobbs oversaw her own election
  4. December 2024: Gaining Support — [My action; PPP Resolution Approved; no governance gaps]
  5. April 15, 2025: Public Records Request — [My action; no governance gaps]
  6. May 15, 2025: Let’s Play Hot Potato — Public Records Request runaround
  7. June 25, 2025: Runbeck Contract Delivered - Responsive Record Delivered by Procurement
  8. June 25, 2025: Dominion Contract Delivered - Responsive Record Delivered by Procurement
  9. July 25, 2025; Still Gaining Support - [My action; Another PPP Resolution Approved; no new governance gaps]
  10. November 20, 2025: Debbie Lesko Presentation - Explains Recent Lost Ballots
  11. December 1, 2025: Special Complaint File with Court - [My action; no new governance gaps]
  12. January 24, 2026, Broadening the Support - [My action; PPP Resolution Approved; no new governance gaps]
  13. February 23, 2026: Plaintiff's Briefing - [My action; I filed a brief with the court; no new governance gaps]
  14. March 12, 2026: Maricopa County Defense Briefing - Maricopa County Legal Team's Defense Brief
  15. April 3,, 2026, Plaintiff's Response to the Defense Briefing - [My action; no new governance gaps]
  16. April 15, 2026, Evidentiary Hearing Set - Judge requires additional information before a final decision is made.
  17. June 1, 2026: Judge's Decision - Judge Rules in Favor of the County
  18. June 8, 2026: Arizona State Ombudsman Replies - Representative from the Arizona Ombudsman Citizens's Aid agency
  19. June 9, 2026: Maricopa County Ombudsman Replies - MC response was consistent with Arizona Ombudsman's expectations
  20. August 3, 2026: Submitted Complaint — Formal complaint submitted & response was as expected.

Court Document

On April 14, 2026, the Arizona Superior Court for Maricopa County issued a document titled, Evidentiary Hearing Set. This document provided some of the Judge's initial thoughts on the case based upon the briefings submitted by the Plaintiff and Defendants. A final decision would be made following the Evidentiary Hearing.

Retrieved from "https://arizonacitizenvoice.com/index.php?title=April_15,_2026,_Evidentiary_Hearing_Set&oldid=2975"