6.01: Difference between revisions

From Arizona Citizen Voice
Created page with "'''<big>Principle 6: Define Objectives and Risk Tolerances</big>''' '''Attribute 6.01:''' Management should define objectives clearly to enable the identification of risks and define risk tolerances."
 
 
(16 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Risk Assessment'''
'''<big>Principle 6: Define Objectives and Risk Tolerances</big>'''
'''<big>Principle 6: Define Objectives and Risk Tolerances</big>'''


'''Attribute 6.01:''' Management should define objectives clearly to enable the identification of risks and define risk tolerances.
'''Attribute 6.01:''' Management should define objectives clearly to enable the identification of risks and define risk tolerances.
'''Green Book Attribute Categories for Risk Management'''
The following attributes contribute to the design, implementation, and operating effectiveness of this principle:
* Definitions of Objectives
* Definitions of Risk Tolerances
'''>>>Navigational Buttons<<<'''
* '''[[Index of Attributes]]'''
* '''Previous Attribute - [[5.08]]'''
* '''Next Attribute - [[6.02]]'''
__FORCETOC__
=== Jamie's Story ===
==== [[March 12, 2026: Maricopa County Defense Briefing]] ====
This potential governance gap relates to Adrian Fontes', (Arizona Secretary of State), [https://azsos.gov/news/849 press release on September 30, 2024]. Voter registration records were adversely impacted for approximately 218,000 individuals. These records were corrupted during the transfer of Motor Vehicle Department (MVD) to Maricopa County.
No documentation was provided to me to explain this anomaly. That said, there was a gross misunderstanding the riskiness of the registering voters by the MVD to have that many records corrupted. Contrary to the Green Book, MC management apparently did not identify the risk associated with the collection of voter registration data by the MVD and subsequent transfer to MC Recorder's Office.
=== Election Anomalies ===

Latest revision as of 22:17, 14 September 2026

Risk Assessment

Principle 6: Define Objectives and Risk Tolerances

Attribute 6.01: Management should define objectives clearly to enable the identification of risks and define risk tolerances.

Green Book Attribute Categories for Risk Management

The following attributes contribute to the design, implementation, and operating effectiveness of this principle:

  • Definitions of Objectives
  • Definitions of Risk Tolerances

>>>Navigational Buttons<<<


Jamie's Story

This potential governance gap relates to Adrian Fontes', (Arizona Secretary of State), press release on September 30, 2024. Voter registration records were adversely impacted for approximately 218,000 individuals. These records were corrupted during the transfer of Motor Vehicle Department (MVD) to Maricopa County.

No documentation was provided to me to explain this anomaly. That said, there was a gross misunderstanding the riskiness of the registering voters by the MVD to have that many records corrupted. Contrary to the Green Book, MC management apparently did not identify the risk associated with the collection of voter registration data by the MVD and subsequent transfer to MC Recorder's Office.

Election Anomalies