16.01: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
=== Jamie's Story === | === Jamie's Story === | ||
==== [[June 8, 2026: Arizona State Ombudsman Replies]] ==== | |||
Maricopa County's Ombudsman program is deficient to Arizona Ombudsman Citizens' Aide (AZOCA) agency. Maricopa County has job positions with Ombudsman in the title. However, Maricopa County Ombudsmen do not have the organizational independence to effectively perform their expected duties of an Ombudsman as defined by internationally recognized organizations for Ombudsmen programs. One of the duties of the AZOCA is to summarize the scope of their investigations annually, which is not being implemented at the county-level. | |||
=== Election Anomalies === | === Election Anomalies === | ||
No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute. | No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute. | ||
Latest revision as of 11:14, 15 September 2026
Monitoring
Principle 16 - Perform Monitoring Activities
Attribute 16.01 - Management should establish and operate monitoring activities to monitor the internal control system and evaluate the results.
Attribute Categories
The following attributes contribute to the design, implementation, and operating effectiveness of this principle:
- Establishment of a Baseline
- Internal Control System Monitoring
- Evaluation of Results
>>>Navigational Buttons<<<
- Index of Attributes
- Previous Attribute - 15.09
- Next Attribute - 16.02
Jamie's Story
Maricopa County's Ombudsman program is deficient to Arizona Ombudsman Citizens' Aide (AZOCA) agency. Maricopa County has job positions with Ombudsman in the title. However, Maricopa County Ombudsmen do not have the organizational independence to effectively perform their expected duties of an Ombudsman as defined by internationally recognized organizations for Ombudsmen programs. One of the duties of the AZOCA is to summarize the scope of their investigations annually, which is not being implemented at the county-level.
Election Anomalies
No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.
