1.08: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* '''[[Index of Attributes]]''' | * '''[[Index of Attributes]]''' | ||
* '''Previous Attribute - [[1.07]]''' | * '''Previous Attribute - [[1.07]]''' | ||
* '''Next Attribute - [[1.09]]''' | * '''Next Attribute - [[1.09]]'''__FORCETOC__ | ||
=== Jamie's Story === | === Jamie's Story === | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=== Election Anomalies === | === Election Anomalies === | ||
==== [[Dropbox Collection (2020)]] ==== | |||
The following statement is made in the AZ AG's Office 2020 General Election inverstigation. | |||
"After October 21, 2020, the number of ballots received became too large to utilize the ballot counter and the decision was made to weigh the trays containing approximately 200 ballots each." | |||
The inspector's report did not suggest there were no disciplinary actions taken in response to making an impromptu "decision" that could have adversely affected a critical output (i.e. election integrity). | |||
Potential Governance Gap: | |||
Contrary to the Green Book, it appears that no critique of the "decision" by management. | |||
Latest revision as of 23:49, 19 August 2026
Control Environment
Principle 1: Demonstrate Commitment to Integrity and Ethical Values
Attribute 1.08: Management establishes processes to evaluate performance against the entity's expected standards of conduct and address any deviations in a timely manner.
**
Navigational Buttons:
- Index of Attributes
- Previous Attribute - 1.07
- Next Attribute - 1.09
Jamie's Story
No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.
Election Anomalies
The following statement is made in the AZ AG's Office 2020 General Election inverstigation.
"After October 21, 2020, the number of ballots received became too large to utilize the ballot counter and the decision was made to weigh the trays containing approximately 200 ballots each."
The inspector's report did not suggest there were no disciplinary actions taken in response to making an impromptu "decision" that could have adversely affected a critical output (i.e. election integrity).
Potential Governance Gap:
Contrary to the Green Book, it appears that no critique of the "decision" by management.
