1.06: Difference between revisions

From Corrective Action Plan AZ
← Older edit

Neil thibodaux (talk | contribs)

2 user groups
2,035 edits
VisualWikitext
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:


=== Jamie's Story ===
=== Jamie's Story ===
No examples available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.
None observed.  


=== Election Anomalies ===
=== Election Anomalies ===


==== [[Dropbox Collection (2020)]] ====
==== Arizona Senate Allegations ====
The following statement is made in the AZ AG's Office 2020 General Election inverstigation.
As already noted in Green Book Attribute [[1.01]], [[1.02]], [[1.03]] and [[1.04]] Arizona Senate allegations arose from a failure to recognize the Arizona Senates Oversight Role. These allegations were investigated and reported on by the Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation. The elected officials were considered as a possible oversight entity for MC operations.


"After October 21, 2020, the number of ballots received became too large to utilize the ballot counter and the decision was made to weigh the trays containing approximately 200 ballots each." See the heading [[Dropbox_Collection_(2020)#Deviation:_Missing_Ballot_Counts|Deviation: Missing Ballot Counts]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage for additional details.
This Green Book attribute emphasizes "Tone at the top can be either a driver, as shown in the preceding paragraphs, or a barrier to internal control." The MCBOS didn't cooperated with the Senate. The MCBOS did not respond to subpoenas issued (twice) by the Senate. Instead, the MCBOS chose to pursue court remedies to keep their information private and prevent outsiders from inspecting their equipment. If this is the tone at the top, how do you think subordinates would respond to inquiries?
 
This potential deviation from the Green Book standard applies to the following Arizona Senate Allegations:
 
* Allegation #1 [[Signature Verification]]
* Allegation #2, [[The Anomalies#Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020)|Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020)]]
** Standards were not evident with the following findings from AZ AG's inspector:
*** See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Missing Entries on Election Forms|Deviation: Missing Entries on Election Forms]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
*** See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Missing Ballot Counts|Deviation: Missing Ballot Counts]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
*** See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Used Email instead of EVBTS Forms|Deviation: Used Email instead of EVBTS Forms]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
*** See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Unfulfilled Party Representation Requirement for Couriers.|Deviation: Unfulfilled Party Representation Requirements for Couriers]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
*** See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Fictious Addresses in the MC Voter Registration Database|Deviation: Fictious Addresses in MC Voter Registration Database]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
*** See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Allegations Confirmed|Deviation: Allegations Confirmed]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
 
* Allegation #4, [[The Anomalies#Maricopa County Withholding Audit Data (2020)|Maricopa County Withholding Audit Data (2020)]]
** The uncooperative tone is clearly displayed by the MCBOS and MCBOS member Bill Gates.
* Allegation #5, [[The Anomalies#Pima County Embedded 35,000 Votes (2020)|Pima County Embedded 35,000 Votes (2020)]]
* Allegation #6, [[The Anomalies#Unknown Published Election Fraud Flyer (2020)|Unknown Published Election Fraud Flyer (2020)]]
 
*

Latest revision as of 13:53, 4 September 2026

Control Environment

Principle 1: Demonstrate Commitment to Integrity and Ethical Values

Attribute 1.06: Management establishes standards of conduct to communicate expectations concerning integrity and ethical values. The entity uses ethical values to balance the needs and concerns of different stakeholders, such as regulators, service organizations, employees, and the public. The standards of conduct guide the directives, attitudes, and behaviors of the organization in achieving its objectives.

***

Navigational Buttons:


Jamie's Story

None observed.

Election Anomalies

Arizona Senate Allegations

As already noted in Green Book Attribute 1.01, 1.02, 1.03 and 1.04 Arizona Senate allegations arose from a failure to recognize the Arizona Senates Oversight Role. These allegations were investigated and reported on by the Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation. The elected officials were considered as a possible oversight entity for MC operations.

This Green Book attribute emphasizes "Tone at the top can be either a driver, as shown in the preceding paragraphs, or a barrier to internal control." The MCBOS didn't cooperated with the Senate. The MCBOS did not respond to subpoenas issued (twice) by the Senate. Instead, the MCBOS chose to pursue court remedies to keep their information private and prevent outsiders from inspecting their equipment. If this is the tone at the top, how do you think subordinates would respond to inquiries?

This potential deviation from the Green Book standard applies to the following Arizona Senate Allegations:

Retrieved from "https://arizonacitizenvoice.com/index.php?title=1.06&oldid=2349"