1.06: Difference between revisions

From Corrective Action Plan AZ
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:


=== Jamie's Story ===
=== Jamie's Story ===
No examples available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.
None observed.  
 
=== Election Anomalies ===


=== Election Anomalies ===
=== Election Anomalies ===
Line 28: Line 26:
This potential deviation from the Green Book standard applies to the following Arizona Senate Allegations:
This potential deviation from the Green Book standard applies to the following Arizona Senate Allegations:


* Allegation #1 [[Signature Verification|Signature Verifciaton]]
* Allegation #1 [[Signature Verification]]
* Allegation #2, [[The Anomalies#Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020)|Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020)]]
* Allegation #2, [[The Anomalies#Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020)|Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020)]]
** Standards were not evident with the following findings from AZ AG's inspector:
** Standards were not evident with the following findings from AZ AG's inspector:

Latest revision as of 13:53, 4 September 2026

Control Environment

Principle 1: Demonstrate Commitment to Integrity and Ethical Values

Attribute 1.06: Management establishes standards of conduct to communicate expectations concerning integrity and ethical values. The entity uses ethical values to balance the needs and concerns of different stakeholders, such as regulators, service organizations, employees, and the public. The standards of conduct guide the directives, attitudes, and behaviors of the organization in achieving its objectives.

***

Navigational Buttons:


Jamie's Story

None observed.

Election Anomalies

Arizona Senate Allegations

As already noted in Green Book Attribute 1.01, 1.02, 1.03 and 1.04 Arizona Senate allegations arose from a failure to recognize the Arizona Senates Oversight Role. These allegations were investigated and reported on by the Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation. The elected officials were considered as a possible oversight entity for MC operations.

This Green Book attribute emphasizes "Tone at the top can be either a driver, as shown in the preceding paragraphs, or a barrier to internal control." The MCBOS didn't cooperated with the Senate. The MCBOS did not respond to subpoenas issued (twice) by the Senate. Instead, the MCBOS chose to pursue court remedies to keep their information private and prevent outsiders from inspecting their equipment. If this is the tone at the top, how do you think subordinates would respond to inquiries?

This potential deviation from the Green Book standard applies to the following Arizona Senate Allegations: