1.09: Difference between revisions

From Arizona Citizen Voice
← Older editNewer edit →

Neil thibodaux (talk | contribs)

2 user groups
2,850 edits
VisualWikitext
Line 18: Line 18:
=== Election Anomalies ===
=== Election Anomalies ===


==== [[Dropbox Collection (2020)]] ====
===== [[Dropbox Collection (2020)|Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020)]] =====
The following statement is made in the AZ AG's Office 2020 General Election inverstigation.
Governance issues identified from [https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation] of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County Election Department - Drop Box Collections issues. Five procedure violations were identified. However, it is impossible to determine the impact to prevent, detect and subsequently investigation potential fraud from an unknown number of ballots affected by these violations.  


"After October 21, 2020, the number of ballots received became too large to utilize the ballot counter and the decision was made to weigh the trays containing approximately 200 ballots each.
* See the heading xxx from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
 
* See the heading xxx from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
Potential Governance Gap:
* See the heading xxx from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
 
* See the heading xxx from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
Contrary to the Green Book, it's unclear whether it was a frontline or management, but a "decision was made" to deviate from using the ballot counter as part of what appears to be an established process. This appears to be an ethical concern in that willful deviations from the process can be implemented on the fly.
* See the heading xxx from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.

Revision as of 14:10, 23 August 2026

Control Environment

Principle 1: Demonstrate Commitment to Integrity and Ethical Values

Attribute 1.09: Management uses established standards of conduct as the basis for evaluating adherence to integrity and ethical values across the organization. Management evaluates the adherence to standards of conduct across all levels of the entity. To gain assurance that the entity's standards of conduct are implemented effectively, management evaluates the directives, attitudes, and behaviors of individuals and teams. Evaluations may consist of ongoing monitoring or separate evaluations. Individual personnel can also report issues through reporting lines, such as regular staff meetings, upward feedback processes, a whistleblowing program, or an ethics hotline. The oversight body evaluates management's adherence to the standards of conduct as well as the overall adherence by the entity.

**

Navigational Buttons:

Jamie's Story

No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.

Election Anomalies

Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020)

Governance issues identified from Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County Election Department - Drop Box Collections issues. Five procedure violations were identified. However, it is impossible to determine the impact to prevent, detect and subsequently investigation potential fraud from an unknown number of ballots affected by these violations.

  • See the heading xxx from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
  • See the heading xxx from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
  • See the heading xxx from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
  • See the heading xxx from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
  • See the heading xxx from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
Retrieved from "https://arizonacitizenvoice.com/index.php?title=1.09&oldid=1664"