4.02: Difference between revisions

From Arizona Citizen Voice
No edit summary
Line 29: Line 29:
* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Noteworthy: Consequences Unknown|Noteworthy: Consequences Unknown]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage
* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Noteworthy: Consequences Unknown|Noteworthy: Consequences Unknown]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage
* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Noteworthy: Transmission of USPS Data to MC and Runbeck|Noteworthy: Transmission of USPS Data to MC and Runbeck]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage
* See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Noteworthy: Transmission of USPS Data to MC and Runbeck|Noteworthy: Transmission of USPS Data to MC and Runbeck]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage
===== [[2020 Maricopa County Directs Use of Sharpie Pens]] =====
The Maricopa County Assistant Director of Recruitment and Training appears to be directing voting center personnel, which is unusual. The line leader, in other word, the person responsible for worker behaviors should be giving the directions, not a staff leader. A competent leader would stay in their role.
Additionally, the Maricopa County Assistant Director of Recruitment and Training appears be directing "inspectors" to deviate from the instructions written on the ballots to use ballpoint pens. A competent inspector would refuse to comply with verbal directions, contrary to written instructions.

Revision as of 16:23, 6 September 2026

Control Environment

Principle 4 - Demonstrate Commitment to Competence

Attribute 4.02 - Management establishes expectations of competence for key roles, and other roles at management's discretion, to help the entity achieve its objectives. Competence is the capability to carry out assigned responsibilities. It requires relevant knowledge, skills, and abilities, which are gained largely from professional experience, training, and certifications. It is demonstrated by the behavior of individuals as they carry out their responsibilities.

>>>Navigational Buttons<<<


No Examples

Jamie's Story

No examples

Election Anomalies

Governance issues identified from Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County Election Department - Drop Box Collections issues. Five procedure violations were identified by the AZ AG's inspector, especially considering this was a narrowly focused aspect of the Election process. However, the adverse impact could not be determined. These procedure violations could have possibly prevented the introduction of hundreds, thousands or tens of thousands of fraudulent ballots for tabulation. MC's ability to detect fraud or retrieve data during a subsequent fraud investigation were also adversely impacted. The competency of Election Leadership is questionable.

The Maricopa County Assistant Director of Recruitment and Training appears to be directing voting center personnel, which is unusual. The line leader, in other word, the person responsible for worker behaviors should be giving the directions, not a staff leader. A competent leader would stay in their role.

Additionally, the Maricopa County Assistant Director of Recruitment and Training appears be directing "inspectors" to deviate from the instructions written on the ballots to use ballpoint pens. A competent inspector would refuse to comply with verbal directions, contrary to written instructions.