Heat Maps: Difference between revisions
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
==== Summary ==== | ==== Summary ==== | ||
The weakest areas of governance were with the following principles: | The weakest areas of governance were with the following principles: | ||
| Line 35: | Line 33: | ||
* Principle #12 - Implement Control Activities (43%) | * Principle #12 - Implement Control Activities (43%) | ||
* Principle #8 - Assess Fraud, Improper Payments and Information (39%) | * Principle #8 - Assess Fraud, Improper Payments and Information (39%) | ||
Note: Principle #2 - Exercise Oversight Responsibility scored low (8%). However, this principle is perhaps the biggest issue. All 14 Election Anomalies were identified to have a gap with oversight. Maricopa County Board of Supervisors did not acknowledge the Arizona Senates oversight role, which digressed into a litigated settlement agreement. Maricopa did not respond to Jamie's inquiries. The Arizona Secretary of State was legally responsible for providing oversight for Arizona Elections, but was ineffective in the oversight role. | |||
Revision as of 22:45, 6 September 2026
[need intro]
Combined
Jamies' Story
Election Anomalies
There were 14 events evaluated for potential governance gaps, which are deviations from the Green Book Standard. The Heat Map of Election Anomalies was comprised of the following events:
- AZ AG's Investigation: Allegation #1 - Signature Verification
- AZ AG's Investigation: Allegation #2- Drop Box Collection
- AZ AG's Investigation: Allegation #3- Election Management System (EMS): Sub-allegation #1 - Data Purged
- AZ AG's Investigation: Allegation #3 - EMS: Sub-allegation #2 - Election Files Deleted
- AZ AG's Investigation: Allegation #3 - EMS: Sub-allegation #3 - Corrupt Ballot Images
- AZ AG's Investigation: Allegation #3 - EMS: Sub-allegation #4 - Missing Ballot Images
- AZ AG's Investigation: Allegation #3 - EMS: Sub-allegation #5 - Failure to follow basic Cyber Security practices
- AZ AG's Investigation: Allegation #3 - EMS: Sub-allegation #6 - Subpoenaed Equipment Not Provided
- AZ AG's Investigation: Allegation #3 - EMS: Sub-allegation #7 - Anonymous Logins
- AZ AG's Investigation: Allegation #3 - EMS: Sub-allegation #8 - Dual Boot System Discovered
- AZ AG's Investigation: Allegation #3 - EMS: Sub-allegation #9 - Operating System Logs Not Preserved
- AZ AG's Investigation: Allegation #3 - EMS: Sub-allegation #10 - Internet Connection to the EMS
- AZ AG's Investigation: Allegation #4 - Maricopa County Board of Supervisors did not Provide for Audit
- Maricopa County Assistant Director email Suspends Sharpie Markers and then directs there use on Election Day
Heat Map of Election Anomalies
Summary
The weakest areas of governance were with the following principles:
- Principle #1 - Demonstrate Commitment to Integrity and Ethical Values (54%)
- Principle #17 - Evaluate Issues and Remediate Deficiencies (54%)
- Principle #12 - Implement Control Activities (43%)
- Principle #8 - Assess Fraud, Improper Payments and Information (39%)
Note: Principle #2 - Exercise Oversight Responsibility scored low (8%). However, this principle is perhaps the biggest issue. All 14 Election Anomalies were identified to have a gap with oversight. Maricopa County Board of Supervisors did not acknowledge the Arizona Senates oversight role, which digressed into a litigated settlement agreement. Maricopa did not respond to Jamie's inquiries. The Arizona Secretary of State was legally responsible for providing oversight for Arizona Elections, but was ineffective in the oversight role.
