1.03: Difference between revisions
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
Governance issues identified from [https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation] of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County Election Department - Drop Box Collections issues. | Governance issues identified from [https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation] of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County Election Department - Drop Box Collections issues. | ||
MC management team was ineffective at addressing procedure violations as they occurred given the scope of missing data and signatures from Early Voting Ballot Transport Statement. See the heading | MC management team was ineffective at addressing procedure violations as they occurred given the scope of missing data and signatures from Early Voting Ballot Transport Statement. See the heading Missing Entries on Election Forms from [[Dropbox Collection (2020)|Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020)]] webpage. | ||
Revision as of 13:38, 23 August 2026
Principle 1 - Demonstrate Commitment to Integrity and Ethical Values
Attribute: 1.03: The oversight body and management lead by an example that demonstrates the organization's values, philosophy, and operating style. The oversight body and management set the tone at the top and throughout the organization by their example, which is fundamental to an effective internal control system. In larger entities, the various layers of management in the organizational structure may also set the "tone in the middle." Although it is the oversight body and management's responsibility to set the tone at the top, other personnel throughout the entity play an important role in supporting the tone that permeates the organizational culture.
***
Navigational Buttons:
- Index of Attributes
- Previous Attribute - 1.02
- Next Attribute -1.04
Jamie's Story
The discussion of Attribute 1.03 is from this March 12, 2026 event, under the subheading of Erroneous Request to Fabricate Records.
At issue, is the Maricopa's County presentation of the concept that they could produce after the fact documentation but are under no statutory obligation to do so. It is presumed that Maricopa County management concurred with this belief, assuming they provided oversight to the legal team's claims made in the Defense brief. In my work experience, after the fact creation of documentation would have been considered unethical or illegal.
Potential Green Book Deviation:
Contrary to the Green Book, Maricopa County management appears to accept the position that documents can be produced after the fact based on the information contained within the Defense Brief. The Legal team claimed Maricopa County could create documentation after the fact but are not obligated to do so.
Election Anomalies
Governance issues identified from Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County Election Department - Drop Box Collections issues.
MC management team was ineffective at addressing procedure violations as they occurred given the scope of missing data and signatures from Early Voting Ballot Transport Statement. See the heading Missing Entries on Election Forms from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage.
