7.05: Difference between revisions
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=== Election Anomalies === | === Election Anomalies === | ||
Principle 7 addresses the need to Identify, Analyze, and Respond to Risks. The identification and analysis of risk are presumed to have been performed at the state level, which are addressed in the [https://apps.azsos.gov/election/files/epm/2025/Election-Procedures-Manual-2025--FINAL-12-22-25.pdf Arizona Secretary of State's Election Procedure Manual.] The MC leadership team's <u>Response to Risk</u> is the primary governance weakness with respect to the Green Book's Principle #7, including this attribute. | |||
===== [[Signature Verification|Maricopa County Signature Verification (2020)]] ===== | ===== [[Signature Verification|Maricopa County Signature Verification (2020)]] ===== | ||
Governance issues identified from [https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation] of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County - Signature Verification Process issues. This attribute was deemed relevant given the early ballot requires significant security to ensure only valid early ballots are tabulated. The risk of undetected fraudulent ballots does not appear to be taken seriously. There are three methods to ensure an erroneously rejected early ballot is returned for tabulation, but the Signature Verifier is a single person responsible for detecting fraudulent ballots . | Governance issues identified from [https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation] of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County - Signature Verification Process issues. This attribute was deemed relevant given the early ballot requires significant security to ensure only valid early ballots are tabulated. The risk of undetected fraudulent ballots does not appear to be taken seriously. There are three methods to ensure an erroneously rejected early ballot is returned for tabulation, but the Signature Verifier is a single person responsible for detecting fraudulent ballots . | ||
Revision as of 08:47, 25 August 2026
Risk Assessment
Principle 7 - Identify, Analyze, and Respond to Risks
Attribute 7.05 - Management's consideration of risk factors related to fraud, improper payments, and information security is discussed further in principle 8. Management's consideration of significant internal and external changes that could impact the internal control system is discussed further in principle 9.
>>>Navigational Buttons<<<
- Index of Attributes
- Previous Attribute - 7.04
- Next Attribute - 7.06
Jamie's Story
No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.
Election Anomalies
Principle 7 addresses the need to Identify, Analyze, and Respond to Risks. The identification and analysis of risk are presumed to have been performed at the state level, which are addressed in the Arizona Secretary of State's Election Procedure Manual. The MC leadership team's Response to Risk is the primary governance weakness with respect to the Green Book's Principle #7, including this attribute.
Governance issues identified from Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County - Signature Verification Process issues. This attribute was deemed relevant given the early ballot requires significant security to ensure only valid early ballots are tabulated. The risk of undetected fraudulent ballots does not appear to be taken seriously. There are three methods to ensure an erroneously rejected early ballot is returned for tabulation, but the Signature Verifier is a single person responsible for detecting fraudulent ballots .
