17.06: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
Governance issues identified from [https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation] of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County Election Department - Drop Box Collections issues. | Governance issues identified from [https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation] of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County Election Department - Drop Box Collections issues. | ||
No corrective actions to the five identified procedure violations were identified in the AZ AG's inspector's report. | No corrective actions to the five identified procedure violations were identified in the AZ AG's inspector's report. See the heading [[Dropbox Collection (2020)#Deviation: Allegations Confirmed|Deviation: Allegations Confirmed]] from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage for additional details. | ||
===== [[Signature Verification|Maricopa County Signature Verification (2020)]] ===== | ===== [[Signature Verification|Maricopa County Signature Verification (2020)]] ===== | ||
Governance issues identified from [https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation] of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County - Signature Verification Process issues. No corrective actions were noted in the inspector's report, which is consistent with a lack of an evaluation. | Governance issues identified from [https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation] of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County - Signature Verification Process issues. No corrective actions were noted in the inspector's report, which is consistent with a lack of an evaluation. | ||
Revision as of 13:47, 26 August 2026
Monitoring
Principle 17 - Evaluate Issues and Remediate Deficiencies
Attribute 17.06 - Management completes and documents corrective actions to remediate internal control deficiencies, including those reported from internal and external audits and evaluations, on a timely basis [documentation requirement]. Depending on the nature of the deficiency, either the oversight body or management oversees the prompt remediation of deficiencies by communicating the corrective actions to the appropriate level of the organizational structure and delegating authority for completing corrective actions to appropriate personnel. Documentation of corrective actions may include
- root cause analysis,
- planned actions,
- interim milestones,
- completion dates,
- measurable indicators of compliance and remediation to assess and validate progress throughout the remediation process, and
- the entity official responsible for monitoring the status of the corrective actions.
Note: The GAO emphasized the "documentation requirement."
>>>Navigational Buttons<<<
- Index of Attributes
- Previous Attribute - 17.05
- Next Attribute - 17.07
Jamie's Story
No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.
Election Anomalies
Governance issues identified from Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County Election Department - Drop Box Collections issues.
No corrective actions to the five identified procedure violations were identified in the AZ AG's inspector's report. See the heading Deviation: Allegations Confirmed from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage for additional details.
Governance issues identified from Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County - Signature Verification Process issues. No corrective actions were noted in the inspector's report, which is consistent with a lack of an evaluation.
