1.02: Difference between revisions

From Corrective Action Plan AZ
← Older editNewer edit →

Neil thibodaux (talk | contribs)

2 user groups
2,035 edits
VisualWikitext
Line 21: Line 21:


==== Arizona Senate Allegations ====
==== Arizona Senate Allegations ====
This Green Book Attribute, 1.02, implies cooperation is needed between management and oversight, which did not exist.
This Green Book Attribute, 1.02, implies cooperation is needed between management and oversight. Unfortunately, MC appears to believe they are not accountable to any entity, certainly not the public and not the Arizona Legislature.  


Potential governance gaps were identified by the Assessment Team from the [https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation] of Arizona Senate allegations. This Green Book attribute is relevant to all of the allegations submitted by the Arizona Senate since MC Elected Officials and MC leadership failed to recognize the importance of the Arizona Senate's oversight role. Investigative information was withheld by MC Elected Officials and MC Leadership, which ultimately lead to the Arizona Senate formally filing their allegations with the Arizona Attorney General. The public perceives MC leadership as lacking integrity and being unethical when they withhold information from the public and oversight entities, such as the Arizona Senate.  
Potential governance gaps were identified by the Assessment Team from the [https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation] of Arizona Senate allegations. This Green Book attribute is relevant to all of the allegations submitted by the Arizona Senate since MC Elected Officials and MC leadership failed to recognize the importance of the Arizona Senate's oversight role. Investigative information was withheld by MC Elected Officials and MC Leadership, which ultimately lead to the Arizona Senate formally filing their allegations with the Arizona Attorney General. The public perceives MC leadership as lacking integrity and being unethical when they withhold information from the public and oversight entities, such as the Arizona Senate.  

Revision as of 12:13, 1 September 2026

Control Environment

Principle 1: Demonstrate Commitment to Integrity and Ethical Values

Tone at the Top

Attribute 1.02: The oversight body and management demonstrate the importance of integrity and ethical values through their directives, attitudes, and behavior.

***

Navigational Buttons:

Jamie's Story

No examples available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.

Election Anomalies

Arizona Senate Allegations

This Green Book Attribute, 1.02, implies cooperation is needed between management and oversight. Unfortunately, MC appears to believe they are not accountable to any entity, certainly not the public and not the Arizona Legislature.

Potential governance gaps were identified by the Assessment Team from the Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation of Arizona Senate allegations. This Green Book attribute is relevant to all of the allegations submitted by the Arizona Senate since MC Elected Officials and MC leadership failed to recognize the importance of the Arizona Senate's oversight role. Investigative information was withheld by MC Elected Officials and MC Leadership, which ultimately lead to the Arizona Senate formally filing their allegations with the Arizona Attorney General. The public perceives MC leadership as lacking integrity and being unethical when they withhold information from the public and oversight entities, such as the Arizona Senate.

This potential deviation from the Green Book standard applies to the following Arizona Senate Allegations:

All of the following are sub-allegations of Allegation #3:

Retrieved from "https://arizonacitizenvoice.com/index.php?title=1.02&oldid=2123"