12.01: Difference between revisions

From Arizona Citizen Voice
Line 46: Line 46:
===== [[Signature Verification|Maricopa County Signature Verification (2020)]] =====
===== [[Signature Verification|Maricopa County Signature Verification (2020)]] =====
Governance issues identified from [https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation] of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County - Signature Verification Process issues. In Section 2 of the AZ AG's inspector's report, it is noted that 33 MC employees received signature verification training, which mirrored the Arizona Secretary of State's recommendation from the [https://apps.azsos.gov/election/files/epm/2025/Election-Procedures-Manual-2025--FINAL-12-22-25.pdf Election Procedure Manual (EPM).] However, it is later noted that 40 temporary workers performed Level 1 Signature Verifications, but were hired after training was implemented. Apparently, these 40 temporary workers performed signature verifications without the training as recommended in the EPM.
Governance issues identified from [https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation] of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County - Signature Verification Process issues. In Section 2 of the AZ AG's inspector's report, it is noted that 33 MC employees received signature verification training, which mirrored the Arizona Secretary of State's recommendation from the [https://apps.azsos.gov/election/files/epm/2025/Election-Procedures-Manual-2025--FINAL-12-22-25.pdf Election Procedure Manual (EPM).] However, it is later noted that 40 temporary workers performed Level 1 Signature Verifications, but were hired after training was implemented. Apparently, these 40 temporary workers performed signature verifications without the training as recommended in the EPM.
==== [[2020 Maricopa County Directs Use of Sharpie Pens]] ====
The Maricopa County Assistant Director of Recruitment and Training directed unethical activities, defeating an internal control. The leadershp position informally instructed personnel to use Sharpie Markers on Election Day, contrary the ballot instructions to use a ballpoint pen. This senior management person was interfering with internal controls.

Revision as of 18:00, 6 September 2026

Control Activities

Principle 12 - Implement Control Activities

Attribute 12.01 - Management should implement control activities through policies and procedures.

Attributes

The following attributes contribute to the design, implementation, and operating effectiveness of this principle:

  • Documentation of Control Activities Through Policies and Procedures
  • Periodic Review of Control Activities

>>>Navigational Buttons<<<


Jamie's Story

No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.

Election Anomalies

Arizona Senate Allegations

Arizona Senate allegations arose from MC's failure to recognize the Arizona Senates Oversight Role. These allegations were investigated and reported on by the Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation. The AZ AG's inspector relied on interviews to determine Information Technology (IT) practices. Evidently, no procedures were available for the inspector's review. Documented procedures ensure consistency in operations. This governance gap is most relevant to the indeterminate findings of the investigation, which are as follows:

Governance issues identified from Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County Election Department - Drop Box Collections issues. Section 2 of the AZ AG's inspector's report identified five procedure violations. See the heading Deviation: Allegations Confirmed from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage for additional details. This finding was based on the following:

Governance issues identified from Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County - Signature Verification Process issues. In Section 2 of the AZ AG's inspector's report, it is noted that 33 MC employees received signature verification training, which mirrored the Arizona Secretary of State's recommendation from the Election Procedure Manual (EPM). However, it is later noted that 40 temporary workers performed Level 1 Signature Verifications, but were hired after training was implemented. Apparently, these 40 temporary workers performed signature verifications without the training as recommended in the EPM.

The Maricopa County Assistant Director of Recruitment and Training directed unethical activities, defeating an internal control. The leadershp position informally instructed personnel to use Sharpie Markers on Election Day, contrary the ballot instructions to use a ballpoint pen. This senior management person was interfering with internal controls.