4.03: Difference between revisions
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
The Maricopa County Assistant Director of Recruitment and Training appears to be directing voting center personnel, which is unusual. The line leader, in other word, the person responsible for worker behaviors should be giving the directions, not a staff leader. A competent leader would stay in their role. | The Maricopa County Assistant Director of Recruitment and Training appears to be directing voting center personnel, which is unusual. The line leader, in other word, the person responsible for worker behaviors should be giving the directions, not a staff leader. A competent leader would stay in their role. | ||
Additionally, the Maricopa County Assistant Director of Recruitment and Training appears be directing "inspectors" to | Additionally, the Maricopa County Assistant Director of Recruitment and Training appears be directing "inspectors" to ignore issues and concerns about the Sharpie Markers and use them anyway on Election Day. A competent inspector would elevate the concern to management, but management was the bigger issue. | ||
Latest revision as of 17:46, 9 September 2026
Control Environment
Principle 4 - Demonstrate Commitment to Competence
Attribute 4.03 - Management considers standards of conduct, assigned responsibility, and delegated authority when establishing expectations. Management establishes expectations of competence for key roles. Management may also establish expectations of competence for all personnel through policies within the entity's internal control system.
>>>Navigational Buttons<<<
- Index of Attributes
- Previous Attribute - 4.02
- Next Attribute - 4.04
Jamie's Story
No examples.
Election Anomalies
Potential governance gaps were identified by the Assessment Team from the Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation of Arizona Senate allegations. This Green Book attribute is relevant to all of the allegations submitted by the Arizona Senate since MC Elected Officials and MC leadership failed to recognize the importance of the Arizona Senate's oversight role. Investigative information was withheld by MC Elected Officials and MC Leadership, which ultimately lead to the Arizona Senate formally filing their allegations with the Arizona Attorney General. The public perceives MC leadership as lacking integrity and being unethical when they withhold information from the public and oversight entities, such as the Arizona Senate. This potential deviation from the Green Book standard applies to the following Arizona Senate Allegations:
Allegation #3, Maricopa Election Management Server (2020) included a sub-allegation of MC EMS 2020 - Anonymous Logins. In today's world, IT departments place significant importance on cybersecurity. Normally, anonymous logins would be forbidden. However, it appears to be accepted on a system that could change election outcomes.
The Maricopa County Assistant Director of Recruitment and Training appears to be directing voting center personnel, which is unusual. The line leader, in other word, the person responsible for worker behaviors should be giving the directions, not a staff leader. A competent leader would stay in their role.
Additionally, the Maricopa County Assistant Director of Recruitment and Training appears be directing "inspectors" to ignore issues and concerns about the Sharpie Markers and use them anyway on Election Day. A competent inspector would elevate the concern to management, but management was the bigger issue.
