June 1, 2026: Judge's Decision: Difference between revisions
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
You are here: Poor Governance Data; Poor Governance Examples; Jamie's Example; '''June 1, 2026: Judge's Decision.'''<blockquote>The next part of Jamie's Story is [[June 8, 2026: Maricopa County's Ombudsman]] </blockquote> | You are here: Poor Governance Data; Poor Governance Examples; Jamie's Example; '''June 1, 2026: Judge's Decision.'''<blockquote>The next part of Jamie's Story is [[June 8, 2026: Maricopa County's Ombudsman]] </blockquote> | ||
----On June 1, 2026, the final decision of Judge Warner regarding case CV 2025-063720 was published. The judgement was in favor of Maricopa County. The first and last page of this decision are shown below. | ----On June 1, 2026, the final decision of Judge Warner regarding case CV 2025-063720 was published. The judgement was in favor of Maricopa County. The first and last page of this decision are shown below. | ||
| Line 10: | Line 8: | ||
=== Court Document: Final Decision === | === Court Document: Final Decision === | ||
[[Media:2026-06-01 Court Final Decision.pdf|Final Decision]] | On June 1, 2026, the Arizona Superior Court for Maricopa County published the Judges [[Media:2026-06-01 Court Final Decision.pdf|Final Decision]] in Jamie's case against Maricopa County. | ||
The Judge stated, "Based on the evidence, the Court finds that the County’s search for responsive records was sufficient, and that it produced all responsive records to Plaintiff." | |||
Maricopa County prevailed in their position that all responsive records had been provided. | |||
=== | === Potential Governance Gaps === | ||
No potential governance gaps were identified from this documentation; it was a succinct statement of the final decision. No observations of poor governance could be extracted from this document. | |||
Revision as of 05:48, 11 September 2026
You are here: Poor Governance Data; Poor Governance Examples; Jamie's Example; June 1, 2026: Judge's Decision.
The next part of Jamie's Story is June 8, 2026: Maricopa County's Ombudsman
On June 1, 2026, the final decision of Judge Warner regarding case CV 2025-063720 was published. The judgement was in favor of Maricopa County. The first and last page of this decision are shown below.
No governance gaps were identified from this event since this was a Judge's decision and did not reflect any new aspects of MC governance.
Jamie's Timeline
- 2020: General Election Anomalies — Maricopa County has numerous election anaomalies
- 2021: My Journey Begins — Starting to ask questions about lessons learned
- November 2022: Ethical Issues with Katie Hobbs Overseeing Her Own Election — As Arizona S.O.S., Katie Hobbs oversaw her own election
- December 2024: Gaining Support — [My action; PPP Resolution Approved; no governance gaps]
- April 15, 2025: Public Records Request — [My action; no governance gaps]
- May 15, 2025: Let’s Play Hot Potato — Public Records Request runaround
- June 25, 2025: Runbeck Contract Delivered - Responsive Record Delivered by Procurement
- June 25, 2025: Dominion Contract Delivered - Responsive Record Delivered by Procurement
- July 25, 2025; Still Gaining Support - [My action; Another PPP Resolution Approved; no new governance gaps]
- November 20, 2025: Debbie Lesko Presentation - Explains Recent Lost Ballots
- December 1, 2025: Special Complaint File with Court - [My action; no new governance gaps]
- January 24, 2026, Broadening the Support - [My action; PPP Resolution Approved; no new governance gaps]
- February 23, 2026: Plaintiff's Briefing - [My action; I filed a brief with the court; no new governance gaps]
- March 12, 2026: Maricopa County Defense Briefing - Maricopa County Legal Team's Defense Brief
- April 3,, 2026, Plaintiff's Response to the Defense Briefing - [My action; no new governance gaps]
- April 15, 2026, Evidentiary Hearing Set - Judge requires additional information before a final decision is made.
- June 1, 2026: Judge's Decision - Judge Rules in Favor of the County
- June 8, 2026: Arizona State Ombudsman Replies - Representative from the Arizona Ombudsman Citizens's Aid agency
- June 9, 2026: Maricopa County Ombudsman Replies - MC response was consistent with Arizona Ombudsman's expectations
- August 3, 2026: Submitted Complaint — Formal complaint submitted & response was as expected.
Court Document: Final Decision
On June 1, 2026, the Arizona Superior Court for Maricopa County published the Judges Final Decision in Jamie's case against Maricopa County.
The Judge stated, "Based on the evidence, the Court finds that the County’s search for responsive records was sufficient, and that it produced all responsive records to Plaintiff."
Maricopa County prevailed in their position that all responsive records had been provided.
Potential Governance Gaps
No potential governance gaps were identified from this documentation; it was a succinct statement of the final decision. No observations of poor governance could be extracted from this document.
