2.06: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
=== Jamie's Story === | === Jamie's Story === | ||
==== [[November 20, 2025: Debbie Lesko Presentation]] ==== | |||
Debbie Lesko provides an oversight role as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors (MCBOS). Her presentation of why two boxes of ballots could not be located for three days following a November 2025 election parroted the [https://elections.maricopa.gov/news-and-information/elections-news/november-statement-election-1172025.html Election's Department statement]from November 7, 2025. She seemed to be accepting of people not following procedures to place the boxes of ballots in an unauthorized location for transport and how fortuitous it was that they had coincidently been stored in an area with 24-hour surveillance. Hence, a person in an oversight role did not see the need to investigate the incident for the purpose of determining corrective actions to prevent recurrence. | |||
=== Election Anomalies === | === Election Anomalies === | ||
No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute. | No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute. | ||
Latest revision as of 19:33, 11 September 2026
Control Environment
Principle 2 - Exercise Oversight Responsibility
Attribute 2.06 - The entity or applicable body also considers the expertise members need to oversee, question, and evaluate management. Capabilities expected of all members of an oversight body include integrity and ethical values, leadership, critical thinking, and problem-solving abilities.
***
Navigational Buttons:
- Index of Attributes
- Previous Attribute - 2.05
- Next Attribute - 2.07
Jamie's Story
Debbie Lesko provides an oversight role as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors (MCBOS). Her presentation of why two boxes of ballots could not be located for three days following a November 2025 election parroted the Election's Department statementfrom November 7, 2025. She seemed to be accepting of people not following procedures to place the boxes of ballots in an unauthorized location for transport and how fortuitous it was that they had coincidently been stored in an area with 24-hour surveillance. Hence, a person in an oversight role did not see the need to investigate the incident for the purpose of determining corrective actions to prevent recurrence.
Election Anomalies
No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.
