17.08

From Arizona Citizen Voice
Revision as of 16:00, 28 August 2026 by Neil thibodaux (talk | contribs) (→Election Anomalies)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Monitoring

Principle 17 - Evaluate Issues and Remediate Deficiencies

Attribute 17.08 - Corrective actions also include remediating audit and evaluation findings. The remediation process begins when audit or other review results are reported to management. It is completed only after action has been taken that (1) corrects identified deficiencies, (2) produces improvements, or (3) demonstrates that the findings and recommendations do not warrant management action. Management, with oversight from the oversight body, monitors the status of remediation efforts so that they are completed on a timely basis.

>>>Navigational Buttons<<<


Jamie's Story

No examples are available to illustrate governance gaps for this attribute.

Election Anomalies

Arizona Senate Allegations

Arizona Senate allegations arose from MC's failure to recognize the Arizona Senates Oversight Role. These allegations were investigated and reported on by the Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation. These allegations would not have occurred had MC leadership taken action to identify, investigate and remediate internal control issues associated with the 2020 General Election. No corrective actions were identified to the seven indeterminate allegations contained within issue #3, Maricopa County Election Management Server.

Governance issues identified from Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County Election Department - Drop Box Collections issues.

No corrective actions to the five identified procedure violations were identified in the AZ AG's inspector's report. See the heading Deviation: Allegations Confirmed from Maricopa Dropbox Collection (2020) webpage for additional details.