Fraud Flow Diagrams

MC employees and third-party suppliers may be allowing fraudsters to influence election outcomes by not being fully accountable. The explanation provided within this page would not submissible evidence in a court of law unless their was sufficient documentation to prove what is presented as conjecture on this page.

None of the MC employees and third-party suppliers appear to be "conducting" the fraud; they are merely allowing the fraud to occur.

Overview

This page will explain how MC may be facilitating fraud by poor governance. The flow of fraudulent activities will reveal that at no time does a MC official or employee actually commit a fraudulent activity. Instead, poor governance practices allow the fraudsters to attempt to sway election results and may actually achieve that objective because of confidentiality that is universally applied to all ballots. This confidentiality allows fraudster to prevail in their efforts because MC officials and employees are not complying with the 1) Arizona Revised Statutes, 2) Arizona Secretary of State's Election Procedures Manual and 3) Maricopa County Elections Department Procedures.

How is this not fraud you may ask?

MC officials, management and employees are not applying good governance. The door is opened to outside fraud when there is no accountably to established standards that ensure election integrity. For example, procedure violations were reported in the Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation, Section 2, Finding (Page 6-7). Procedure steps established to prevent fraud, if ignored, allow fraud. MC management appears to tolerate noncompliant behavior given there is no discussion of any attempt to correct deviant behaviors based on the AG's report.

This Overview present "one way" fraudsters may be exploiting MC weakness to illegally influence election results. Each of the key steps in this fraud scenario will be discussed in more detail below. Meanwhile, the key steps are summarized as follows:

1. Flood the Voter Rolls - This fraud strategy relies on a massive amounts of early ballots being distributed to the public. Therefore, the fraudsters begin by creating a voter registration record for an ineligible voter or a fictious voter. The more ballots in the public the greater chance of success from the fraudsters.
2. Allow Voter Rolls to be Corrupted - The fraudsters depend on a minimalistic approach to maintaining an accurate voter registration database.