8.05: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Contrary to the Green Book, MC had failed to sufficiently identify risk to information during the process of collection and subsequent transfer of voter registration data from the MVD to MC prior to the September 2024 press release. The lack of a written agreement between MC and MVD suggest no action was taken to address a known risk after single error was found. | Contrary to the Green Book, MC had failed to sufficiently identify risk to information during the process of collection and subsequent transfer of voter registration data from the MVD to MC prior to the September 2024 press release. The lack of a written agreement between MC and MVD suggest no action was taken to address a known risk after single error was found. | ||
=== | === Election Anomalies === | ||
===== [[Signature Verification|Maricopa County Signature Verification (2020)]] ===== | |||
Governance issues identified from [https://www.azag.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/2020_General_Election_Investigation_Summary.pdf Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation] of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County - Signature Verification Process issues. In section 1 of this report, the inspector notes that only 537 ''bad'' signatures were identified from a mismatch. | |||
Meanwhile, an external source, a USPS Inspector, reported over 56,226 early ballots were returned to the USPS as undeliverable as noted by in Section 2 of the same report. In the wrong hand, these are a fraud risk and it is doubtful that the Signature Verifiers could detect those with such a low rejection rate. | |||
MC Elections will proclaim they are in compliance with the [https://apps.azsos.gov/election/files/epm/2025/Election-Procedures-Manual-2025--FINAL-12-22-25.pdf Arizona Secretary of State's Election Procedures Manual]; end of story. You will not see the MC Elections department investigation the situation. Apparently, they do not feel obligated to investigate process weaknesses. It's clear that they don't want anyone else to investigation for potential fraud, which is apparently why the F.B.I seized records in 2026. | |||
Revision as of 12:02, 22 August 2026
Risk Assessment
Principle 8 - Assess Fraud, Improper Payment, and Information Security Risk
Attribute 8.05 - Management considers information that internal and external parties provide to identify risks related to fraud, improper payments, and information security. This may include information reported by the office of inspector general, internal auditors, personnel, service organizations, and other external parties that interact with the entity. Information may include emerging information security threats, identified instances of improper payments, or adjudicated cases of fraud as well as suspected or alleged fraud.
>>>Navigational Buttons<<<
- Index of Attributes
- Previous Attribute - 8.04
- Next Attribute - 8.06
- Similar Attribute(s) - 8.07
Jamie's Story
Additional details regarding this aspect of my story are available in a subsection titled Contract with the Motor Vehicle Department (MVD).
In 2024, the Arizona Secretary of State, Adrian Fontes, issued a press release on September 30, 2024, which described how over 218,000 voter registration records were adversely impacted during the collection of data by the MVD and subsequent transfer to the MC Recorders Office. The press release states, "Staff and experts from the Secretary of State’s Office are continuing to work with MVD to investigate if additional voters are impacted, or if other similar errors stemming from improperly coded Proposition 200 rules exist. We will continue to keep the public informed of developments if and when we have accurate, confirmed information to share." The Information Security Risk was real based on the number of corrupted records identified. Yet, MC managers and legal team had no written agreements between them and the MVD.
Potential Green Book Deviation:
Contrary to the Green Book, MC had failed to sufficiently identify risk to information during the process of collection and subsequent transfer of voter registration data from the MVD to MC prior to the September 2024 press release. The lack of a written agreement between MC and MVD suggest no action was taken to address a known risk after single error was found.
Election Anomalies
Governance issues identified from Arizona Attorney General's Office 2020 General Election Investigation of Arizona Senate allegations of Maricopa County - Signature Verification Process issues. In section 1 of this report, the inspector notes that only 537 bad signatures were identified from a mismatch.
Meanwhile, an external source, a USPS Inspector, reported over 56,226 early ballots were returned to the USPS as undeliverable as noted by in Section 2 of the same report. In the wrong hand, these are a fraud risk and it is doubtful that the Signature Verifiers could detect those with such a low rejection rate.
MC Elections will proclaim they are in compliance with the Arizona Secretary of State's Election Procedures Manual; end of story. You will not see the MC Elections department investigation the situation. Apparently, they do not feel obligated to investigate process weaknesses. It's clear that they don't want anyone else to investigation for potential fraud, which is apparently why the F.B.I seized records in 2026.
