August 3, 2026: Submitted Complaint

August 3, 2026: Submitted Complaint

On August, 3, 2026, I submitted my complaint in accordance with the guidance of [abc-Jen] and the special link that was sent to me, which wasn’t accessible on the public webpage. The complaint summarizes my objectives, which are cross-referenced to Part B, Governance Gaps. Generally speaking, the complaint consisted of the following topics;

- Complaint #1 requests the Contract Compliance Review that I was

   directed to submit through the Office of Procurement Services. It
   seeks written determinations regarding unresolved contract
   compliance questions arising from my Public Records Request and
   related correspondence.

- Complaint #2 raises a separate governance question. Throughout this

   case study, my concerns involved multiple County functions,
   including Procurement, Elections, the Recorder's Office, Information
   Governance, County Management, and the Board of Supervisors. While I
   was directed to the Procurement complaint process for
   contract-related concerns, I have been unable to identify a publicly
   documented process informing citizens where to submit a governance
   complaint concerning the County's compliance review process itself
   or other cross-department compliance concerns.

Timeline

1. Preface — Author's introduction
2. 2020: The Event — The November 2020 general election anomalies
3. 2001: The Journey Begins — Starting to ask questions about lessons learned
4. November 2024: Midterm Election — The Katie Hobbs situation
5. December 2024: Gaining Support — Resolution submission
6. April 15, 2025: Public Records Request — Public Records Request process
7. May 15, 2025: Let — Public Records Request runaround
8. August 3, 2026: Submitted Complaint — Formal complaint submission

Navigation

Quick Navigation
🏠 Main Page	📖 The Story	📊 Governance Analysis

Related Governance Principles

• 📊 Governance Analysis
• ❓ What is a CAP?
• 📗 About the Green Book
• ✍️ About the Author